You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 267 No. 10, March 11, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HIV-Infected Professionals, Patient Rights, and the 'Switching Dilemma'

Norman Daniels, PhD

JAMA. 1992;267(10):1368-1371.


Abstract

The ethical issues surrounding the Centers for Disease Control and American Medical Association guidelines for health professionals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus are examined and discussed. Although human immunodeficiency virus transmission risks during surgery are lower than many risks we routinely face, it is not irrational for a patient to want to switch from an infected professional to an uninfected one. The American Medical Association claim that physicians have a duty to avoid imposing any identifiable risks is implausible. Knowing the Centers for Disease Control estimate of risks gives us no way to decide whether the rights of patients or those of handicapped (infected) workers should be given priority. Granting priority to patient rights, either by giving patients the opportunity to know the risks they face and to switch to another provider, or by removing infected providers (compulsory switching), makes us all worse off. This gives us reason to reject these guidelines and emphasize other infection control measures.

(JAMA. 1992;267:1368-1371)



Author Affiliations

From the Philosophy Department, Tufts University, Medford, Mass.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Philosophy Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02168 (Dr Daniels).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Proposed National Policy on Health Care Workers Living With HIV/AIDS and Other Blood-Borne Pathogens
Gostin
JAMA 2000;284:1965-1970.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Access to Information on Clinicians Infected With Blood-Borne Pathogens
Fost
JAMA 2000;284:1975-1976.
FULL TEXT  

Risk of Hepatitis C Transmission From Infected Medical Staff to Patients: Model-Based Calculations for Surgical Settings
Ross et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2313-2316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Immunodeficiency Virus^Infected Health Care Workers: The Restoration of Professional Authority
Burris
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:102-106.
ABSTRACT  

Nothing to Fear But Fear Itself: HIV-Infected Physicians and the Law of Informed Consent
De Ville
J Law Med Ethics 1994;22:163-175.
 

Commentary: A Call for Authoritative CDC Guidelines for HIV-Infected Health Care Workers
Hermann
J Law Med Ethics 1994;22:176-178.
 

HIV-Infected Health Care Professionals: Public Opinion About Testing, Disclosing, and Switching
Gerbert et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:313-320.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.