You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 267 No. 14, April 8, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prioritizing Oregon's Hospital Resources

An Example Based on Variations in Discretionary Medical Utilization

Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH; H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH; John E. Wennberg, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1992;267(14):1925-1931.


Abstract

Objective.
—To provide an alternative to Oregon's treatment-specific approach to rationing, we propose a prioritization based on the local hospital resources invested in discretionary medical admissions.

Design.
—We used 1988 Oregon hospital discharge data to determine age- and sex-adjusted per-capita rates of inpatient days for discretionary medical admissions (for high-variation medical conditions) in each of 33 hospital service areas. Potential ceiling rates were defined based on prevailing utilization rates for discretionary medical admissions in each hospital service area. Savings were calculated under the assumption that resources allocated for inpatient treatment of these conditions in areas that exceed the ceiling rates were reduced accordingly.

Setting.
—Nonfederal, acute-care hospitals used by Oregon residents.

Study population.
—Oregon residents.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Savings were defined in terms of patient days, hospital beds, hospital charges, and average costs.

Results.
—Among the 16 largest hospital service areas, patient-day rates for discretionary medical admissions ranged from 188 to 335 patient days per thousand. Potential savings from applying different ceiling rates ranged from $0.4 million to $94.7 million per year. If the rate in the state capital (Salem) were used as the ceiling (218 days per thousand), then 238 beds could be closed in 20 hospital service areas, for an estimated cost savings of $47.3 million.

Conclusions.
—Hospital resources invested in discretionary admissions in high-rate areas represent an important potential source of funds for reallocation to meet other defined health care needs. Setting limits based on units of health care supply (eg, beds, capital equipment, and physicians) should be considered as an option for resource reallocation within health care.

(JAMA. 1992;267:1925-1931)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences and the Departments of Medicine and Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Fisher, Welch, and Wennberg) and the US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt (Drs Fisher and Welch).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, HB 7250, Strasenburgh Hall, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755-3862 (Dr Fisher).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reduction of Inappropriate Hospital Admissions of Children With Influenza-Like Illness Through the Implementation of Specific Guidelines: A Case-Controlled Study
De Marco et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:e506-e511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of a Bronchiolitis Guideline* : A Multisite Demonstration Project
Kotagal et al.
Chest 2002;121:1789-1797.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:144-158.
 

Design and Pilot Evaluation of a System to Develop Computer-based Site-specific Practice Guidelines from Decision Models
Sanders et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:145-159.
ABSTRACT  

Geographic Variations in the Rates of Operative Procedures Involving the Shoulder, Including Total Shoulder Replacement, Humeral Head Replacement, and Rotator Cuff Repair
VITALE et al.
JBJS 1999;81:763-72.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benchmarking the US Physician Workforce: An Alternative to Needs-Based or Demand-Based Planning
Goodman et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1811-1817.
ABSTRACT  

Hospital Readmission Rates for Cohorts of Medicare Beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven
Fisher et al.
NEJM 1994;331:989-995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Quality of Care: Reforming the Health Care System
Longo and Daugird
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Outcome of Hospitalized Injured Patients After Institution of a Trauma System in an Urban Area
Mullins et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1919-1924.
ABSTRACT  

Setting Limits in Clinical Medicine
Murphy et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:505-512.
ABSTRACT  

Geographic Variation in Expenditures for Physicians' Services in the United States
Welch et al.
NEJM 1993;328:621-627.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Priorities in Oregon
Caper
JAMA 1992;268:1267-1268.
ABSTRACT  

Oregon: A Better Method to Reallocate Resources?
Schramm
JAMA 1992;267:1967-1967.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.