You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 267 No. 2, January 8, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Case and survival definitions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Effect on survival rate calculation

T. D. Valenzuela, D. W. Spaite, H. W. Meislin, L. L. Clark, A. L. Wright and G. A. Ewy
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, Tucson.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the effect of different case and survival definitions of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on survival rate calculations. DESIGN--A 22-month case series of nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. SETTING--Southwestern city (population, 400,000; area, 390 km2) with a two-tiered emergency response system consisting of emergency medical technicians and paramedics. PATIENTS--A consecutive sample of 372 patients found without palpable pulse of spontaneous respiration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Survival rate after cardiac arrest was calculated using three case definitions of arrest and two definitions of survival. RESULTS--Twenty percent of all patients survived to hospital admission and 6% survived to hospital discharge. Twenty-six percent of adults whose collapse was witnessed survived to hospital admission, and 10% survived to hospital discharge. Patients whose collapse was witnessed and who experienced initial ventricular fibrillation survived to hospital admission in 38% and to hospital discharge in 15% of cases. CONCLUSIONS--The survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies widely depending on the case and survival definitions selected. To facilitate intersystem comparison and assessment of interventions designed to improve outcome, the Utstein Consensus Conference recommended that case and survival definitions should be adopted by all prehospital emergency systems.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk stratifiers for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the community: primary prevention of SCD
Albert and Ruskin
Cardiovasc Res 2001;50:186-196.
FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Rapid Defibrillation by Security Officers after Cardiac Arrest in Casinos
Valenzuela et al.
NEJM 2000;343:1206-1209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long term outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with physician staffed emergency medical services: the Utstein style applied to a midsized urban/suburban area
Böttiger et al.
Heart 1999;82:674-679.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: Results from the AVID registry
Epstein et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1111-1116.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public access defibrillation: a review
Kern
Heart 1998;80:402-404.
FULL TEXT  

Fish Consumption and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death
Albert et al.
JAMA 1998;279:23-28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating Effectiveness of Cardiac Arrest Interventions : A Logistic Regression Survival Model
Valenzuela et al.
Circulation 1997;96:3308-3313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.