You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 267 No. 22, June 10, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Firearm and nonfirearm homicide among persons 15 through 19 years of age. Differences by level of urbanization, United States, 1979 through 1989

L. A. Fingerhut, D. D. Ingram and J. J. Feldman
Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control, Hyattsville, Md 20782.

OBJECTIVE--To examine trends (1979 through 1989) and current status in firearm and nonfirearm homicide rates by level of urbanization among persons 15 through 19 years of age. DESIGN--The Compressed Mortality File, a county-level mortality and population database maintained by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control, Hyattsville, Md, and the 1980 Human Resource Profile County Codes are used to analyze age-, sex-, and race-specific firearm and nonfirearm homicide rates by urbanization level. SETTING--United States, 1979 through 1989. SUBJECTS--Black and white males and females 15 through 19 years of age whose underlying cause of death was either firearm homicide (E965.0 through E965.4 or E970) or nonfirearm homicide (E960 through E964, E965.5 through E969, or E971 through E978) in the ICD-9 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, Ninth Revision). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Urbanization level-specific firearm and nonfirearm homicide rates. RESULTS--The 1989 firearm homicide rate in metropolitan counties was nearly five times the rate in nonmetropolitan counties (13.7 vs 2.9 deaths per 100,000 population). Firearm homicide rates were highest in core metropolitan counties, 27.7 per 100,000 population; rates were higher for black males than for any other race-sex group in each of five county urbanization strata for 1979 through 1989. Nonfirearm homicide rates are considerably lower, with smaller urban differentials; the rate in metropolitan counties was 1.4 times the rate in nonmetropolitan counties (2.6 vs 1.8 per 100,000 population). From 1979 through 1984, firearm homicide rates declined in each of the county strata. From 1984 through 1987, firearm homicide rates increased, and from 1987 through 1989 they increased rapidly, from 23% to 35% per year in the four metropolitan strata. From 1979 through 1989, nonfirearm homicide rates declined or remained stable. CONCLUSIONS--Large urbanization differentials in firearm homicide and smaller differentials in nonfirearm homicide are identified. Firearm homicide rates are highest and increasing the fastest among black teenage males in the core, fringe, and medium metropolitan strata.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Firearm Violence Exposure and Serious Violent Behavior
Bingenheimer et al.
Science 2005;308:1323-1326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Urban-Rural Shifts in Intentional Firearm Death: Different Causes, Same Results
Branas et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2004;94:1750-1755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recognizing Homicide as a Public Health Threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence
Pridemore
Homicide Studies 2003;7:182-205.
ABSTRACT  

Rates of Household Firearm Ownership and Homicide Across US Regions and States, 1988-1997
Miller et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1988-1993.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Rural-Urban Continuum: Variability in Statewide Serious Firearm Injuries in Children and Adolescents
Nance et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:781-785.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk factors associated with non-fatal adolescent firearm injuries
Paris et al.
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:147-150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of violence in Karachi, Pakistan
Chotani et al.
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:57-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intentional childhood injuries in Greece 1996-97 - Data from a population-based Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System (EDISS)
Petridou et al.
Scand J Public Health 2001;29:279-284.
ABSTRACT  

Adolescent Violence: Assessment of Nurses' Attitudes and Educational Needs
Breakey et al.
J Holist Nurs 2001;19:143-162.
ABSTRACT  

Policy and Politics
Health Promot Pract 2001;2:27-31.
 

Youth Violence: A Tripartite Examination of Putative Causes, Consequences, and Correlates
McLAUGHLIN et al.
Trauma Violence Abuse 2000;1:115-127.
ABSTRACT  

Beliefs about the risks of guns in the home: analysis of a national survey
Howard et al.
Inj. Prev. 1999;5:284-289.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fractures of the Femoral Shaft in Children. Incidence, Mechanisms, and Sociodemographic Risk Factors
HINTON et al.
JBJS 1999;81:500-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Epidemiology of Adolescent Homicide in North Carolina From 1990 to 1995
Coyne-Beasley et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:349-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Homicide Rates Among US Teenagers and Young Adults: Differences by Mechanism, Level of Urbanization, Race, and Sex,1987 Through 1995
Fingerhut et al.
JAMA 1998;280:423-427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breaking the Cycle of Violence Among Youth Living in Metropolitan Atlanta: A Case History of Kids Alive and Loved
Thomas et al.
Health Educ Behav 1998;25:160-174.
ABSTRACT  

Youth Violence in the City: The Role of Educational Interventions
Greene
Health Educ Behav 1998;25:175-193.
ABSTRACT  

African American Mothers in South Central Los Angeles: Their Fears for Their Newborn's Future
Schuster et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:264-268.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A National Assessment of Secondary School Principals' Perceptions of Violence in Schools
Price and Everett
Health Educ Behav 1997;24:218-229.
ABSTRACT  

Optimal Development in Adolescence: What is it and How Can it be Encouraged?
Wagner
The Counseling Psychologist 1996;24:360-399.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.