This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (25)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Hanlester Network Case and the Safe Harbor Regulation

Thomas S. Crane, JD, MHSA

JAMA. 1992;268(1):85-91.

Abstract
Dramatic changes have taken place in the legal and ethical status of physician self-referral. In July 1991, the US Department of Health and Human Services issued the "safe harbor" regulation, which permits self-referral only under very narrow constraints. In September 1991, the Department of Health and Human Services Departmental Appeals Board ruled in the landmark Hanlester Network case that joint venture profit distributions are illegal under the antikickback statute when intended to influence investors' reason or judgment in referring Medicare or Medicaid patients. Following this principle on remand in March 1992, the Administrative Law Judge precedentially held that profit distributions violated the statute. Before this remand decision, the Departmental Appeals Board ruling and the safe harbor regulation started the pendulum swinging against self-referral as seen, for example, in the December 1991 revised American Medical Association ethical guidelines. To help providers operate in this new legal and ethical climate, legislation is needed to authorize case-by-case safe harbors.

(JAMA. 1992;268:85-91)

Author Affiliations
From the Office of General Counsel, Inspector General Division, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Mr Crane is currently of counsel to the law firm of Hinckley, Allen, Snyder & Comen, Boston, Mass.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Hinckley, Allen, Snyder & Comen, One Financial Center, Boston, MA02111-2625 (Mr Crane).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality of Neurological Care: Balancing Cost Control and Ethics
Bernat
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1341-1345.
ABSTRACT  

Physician Ownership of Physical Therapy Services: Effects on Charges, Utilization, Profits, and Service Characteristics
Mitchell and Scott
JAMA 1992;268:2055-2059.
ABSTRACT  

Must the Law Assure Ethical Behavior?
Todd
JAMA 1992;268:98-98.
ABSTRACT