You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 268 No. 12, September 23, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prognosis After First Myocardial Infarction

Comparison of Q-Wave and Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction in the Framingham Heart Study

Clifford J. Berger, MD; Joanne M. Murabito, MD; Jane C. Evans, MPH; Keaven M. Anderson, PhD; Daniel Levy, MD

JAMA. 1992;268(12):1545-1551.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare the short- and long-term prognosis following a first Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.

Design.
—Cohort study with a mean follow-up period of 5.1 ±4.9 years.

Setting.
—Population-based.

Participants.
—Framingham (Mass) Heart Study subjects with an initial recognized myocardial infarction during a 17-year period were studied, including 227 men and 136 women with a mean age of 67.2 years. Seventy-seven percent of first infarctions were Q-wave infarctions and 23% were non—Q-wave infarctions.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Reinfarction and death from coronary heart disease.

Results.
—During the follow-up period, subjects with non—Q-wave infarctions had a significantly higher rate of reinfarction than subjects in the Q-wave group (P=.02 for the entire follow-up). The 10-year reinfarction rates were 44.8% vs 27.4%. When analyzed separately by age and sex, differences in reinfarction rates were only noted in men and in those under the age of 65 years. There were no differences in coronary heart disease death rates based on Q-wave status, even when examined separately by age and sex. Multivariate analysis revealed a 1.8-fold higher risk of reinfarction in the non—Q-wave group (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.1), and also demonstrated that baseline hypertension was an independent risk factor for predicting reinfarction (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.2). There were no differences in the rates of sudden death or all-cause mortality following the two types of myocardial infarction. Additionally, subjects with a first Q-wave infarction had a higher rate of subsequent congestive heart failure, while those with non—Q-wave infarctions had a significantly higher rate of coronary insufficiency (unstable angina with transient ST-T wave abnormalities).

Conclusions.
—These results confirm and extend findings from prior studies that have identified patients with first non—Q-wave myocardial infarctions as potentially unstable, with greater subsequent morbidity and similar mortality to their counterparts with Q-wave infarctions.

(JAMA. 1992;268:1545-1551)



Author Affiliations

From the Framingham (Mass) Heart Study (Drs Murabito, Anderson, and Levy, and Ms Evans); the Cardiovascular Division (Drs Berger and Levy) and Division of Clinical Epidemiology (Dr Levy), Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass; the Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (Drs Anderson and Levy); and the Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology of Boston (Mass) University School of Medicine (Drs Murabito and Levy and Ms Evans).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Framingham Heart Study, 5 Thurber St, Framingham, MA 01701 (Dr Murabito).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Three-Dimensional Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery Turbo FLASH Sequence for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar
Kino et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;193:W381-W388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Mortality of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Chan et al.
Circulation 2009;119:3110-3117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Heart Failure in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A PEACE Study
Lewis et al.
Circ Heart Fail 2009;2:209-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sudden Death After Myocardial Infarction
Adabag et al.
JAMA 2008;300:2022-2029.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Negative Remodeling and Calcified Plaque in Octogenarians With Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis
Hassani et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2413-2419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Borderzone Geometry After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Three-Dimensional Contrast Enhanced Echocardiographic Study
Jackson et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005;80:2250-2255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone
Schleinitz and Heidenreich
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:251-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of late development of heart failure in stable survivors of myocardial infarction: The CARE study
Lewis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1446-1453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The incidence, predictors, and outcomes of early reinfarction after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
Kernis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1173-1177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing the diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction in patients with a suspected heart attack affects the measurement of 30 day mortality but not long term survival
Packham et al.
Heart 2002;88:337-342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy
Lindahl et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:979-986.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Twenty-two year (1975 to 1997) trends in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case fatality rates from initial q-wave and non-q-wave myocardial infarction: a multi-hospital, community-wide perspective
Furman et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1571-1580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term (three-year) prognosis of patients treated with reperfusion or conservatively after acute myocardial infarction
Gottlieb et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:70-82.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antecedent Hypertension Confers Increased Risk for Adverse Outcomes After Initial Myocardial Infarction
Haider et al.
Hypertension 1997;30:1020-1024.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Hypertension in the Pathogenesis of Heart Failure: A Clinical Mechanistic Overview
Vasan and Levy
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1789-1796.
ABSTRACT  

Using Admission Characteristics to Predict Short-term Mortality From Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients: Results From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
Normand et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1322-1328.
ABSTRACT  

POOR PROGNOSIS AFTER NON-Q-WAVE INFARCTION
JWatch General 1992;1992:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Q-Wave vs Non--Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction: An Oversimplified Dichotomy
Moss
JAMA 1992;268:1595-1596.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.