This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (28)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Attitudes Toward Public Dissemination of Research

Michael S. Wilkes, MD, PhD; Richard L. Kravitz, MD, MSPH

JAMA. 1992;268(8):999-1003.

Abstract
Objective.
—To study the experience of recently published authors with the news media.

Design.
—A self-administered questionnaire.

Participants.
—All first authors of scientific articles published in JAMA and The New England Journal of Medicine during a 6-month period. Of 397 surveyed, 92% responded.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Researchers were asked about (1) their experience with the news media, (2) their attitudes toward the dissemination of health-related research to the general public, and (3) their attitudes toward the lay press.

Results.
—Of respondents, 65% stated that their research was discussed in the lay press, and 60% reported that they were directly contacted by the press. Researchers had positive attitudes toward the press; 86% reported that news reports based on their research were accurate and 44% felt that media coverage would help them achieve their overall professional goals. Positive aspects of media coverage most frequently endorsed were that (1) it improves the image of the profession, (2) it informs the professional community of their research, and (3) it allows the public to understand the topic better. Negative aspects of media coverage were (1)it gives the impression that the researcher is seeking publicity, (2) it creates jealousy among colleagues, and (3) it takes too much time. Researchers were not eager to change the existing dissemination process, yet they endorsed the need for uniform standards concerning relations with the press.

Conclusions.
—The majority of first authors in two leading medical journals reported substantial media coverage of their research, expressed generally positive sentiments about the press coverage of their work, and expressed a need for consensus on interactions involving the press.

(JAMA. 1992;268:999-1003)

Author Affiliations
From the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.

Footnotes
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the above institutions.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic?
Woloshin et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:613-618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interaction Between Academic Radiology and the News Media: A Potentially Powerful and Unpredictable Process--Five Stories
Donnelly et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;192:1382-1387.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the Impact of News Coverage of an HIV Multiclass Drug-Resistant Cluster in Seattle, Washington
Kahle et al.
AJPH 2009;99:S131-S136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers
Bubela and Caulfield
CMAJ 2004;170:1399-1407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs
Cassels et al.
CMAJ 2003;168:1133-1137.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The "Cure" for Cancer: Can the Media Report the Hope Without the Hype?
Daugherty
JCO 2002;20:3761-3764.
FULL TEXT  

Advocacy in public health: roles and challenges
Chapman
Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1226-1232.
FULL TEXT  

Newspaper Coverage of the Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Report
ANKNEY et al.
Science Communication 1996;18:153-164.
ABSTRACT  

A National Survey of Public Health Officers' Interactions With the Media
Gellert et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1285-1289.
ABSTRACT  

Recall of Recommendations and Adherence to Advice Among Patients With Chronic Medical Conditions
Kravitz et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1869-1878.
ABSTRACT  

Are You and Your Waiting Room's Televised "Expert" Saying the Same Thing?
Hickson and Clayton
CLIN PEDIATR 1993;32:172-174.
 

Researchers and the Media
Entman
JAMA 1993;269:216-216.
ABSTRACT  

TV or Not TV Communicating Health Information to the Public
Dan
JAMA 1992;268:1026-1027.
ABSTRACT