You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 1, January 6, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mandatory Parental Consent to Abortion

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association; Oscar W. Clarke, MD; John Glasson, MD; Allison M. August; John A. Barrasso, MD; Charles H. Epps, Jr, MD; Robert McQuillan, MD; Victoria N. Ruff, MD; Charles W. Plows, MD; George T. Wilkins, Jr, MD; David Orentlicher, MD, JD

JAMA. 1993;269(1):82-86.


Abstract

This report analyzes the ethical issues raised by requirements that parents be involved when minors seek an abortion. Parents are generally supportive and understanding and can provide helpful guidance to their children. In some cases, however, parents may respond abusively to the knowledge that their minor child is pregnant or is considering an abortion. In addition, privacy in matters of health care is a profound need of minors as well as adults. Accordingly, the Council concludes that, while minors should be encouraged to discuss their pregnancy with their parents and other adults, minors should not be required to involve their parents before deciding whether to undergo an abortion.

(JAMA. 1993;269:82-86)



Author Affiliations

Gallipolis, Ohio, Chair; Durham, NC, Vice Chair; Brookline, Mass; Casper, Wyo; Washington, DC; Omaha, Neb; Columbus, Ohio; Santa Ana, Calif; Chicago, Ill; Chicago, Ill, Secretary and staff author.

From the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes

This report was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association at the Annual Meeting, June 1992.

Reprint requests to the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (David Orentlicher, MD, JD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

JAMA, Abortion, and Editorial Responsibility
Lundberg
JAMA 1998;280:740-740.
FULL TEXT  

Freedom of Conscience, Professional Responsibility, and Access to Abortion
Dresser
J Law Med Ethics 1994;22:280-285.
 

Septic Abortion
Stubblefield and Grimes
NEJM 1994;331:310-314.
FULL TEXT  

The Practitioner's Role
Braverman and Strasburger
CLIN PEDIATR 1994;33:100-109.
ABSTRACT  

Parental Consent for Abortion
Glancy
JAMA 1993;269:2210-2210.
ABSTRACT  

Parental Consent for Abortion
Richardson
JAMA 1993;269:2210-2211.
ABSTRACT  

Confidential Health Services for Adolescents
Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical As et al.
JAMA 1993;269:1420-1424.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.