You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 18, May 12, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Appropriateness of Hysterectomy

A Comparison of Care in Seven Health Plans

Steven J. Bernstein, MD, MPH; Elizabeth A. McGlynn, PhD; Albert L. Siu, MD, MSPH; Carol P. Roth, RN, MPH; Marjorie J. Sherwood, MD; Joan W. Keesey; Jacqueline Kosecoff, PhD; Nicholas R. Hicks, MRCP (UK), MFPHM; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD; the Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium; Jerome Beloff, MD; Bernard Mansheim, MD; Norbert Goldfield, MD; Francis Lieb, MD; David Ferriss, MD; Bruce Perry, MD; Gerald Plotkin, MD; Jennifer Leaning, MD; Edward Marine, MD; Kathleen Curtin, MBA; John Austin, MD; Andrew Wiesenthal, MD; Terry Carr, RN; Samuel Sapin, MD; Iris Johnson, RN; Gloria Swanson, RN; Sheila Leatherman, MSW

JAMA. 1993;269(18):2398-2402.


Abstract

Objective.
—To develop and test a method for comparing the appropriateness of hysterectomy use in different health plans.

Design.
—Retrospective cohort study.

Setting.
—Seven managed care organizations.

Patients.
—Random sample of all nonemergency, nononcological hysterectomies performed in the seven managed care organizations over a 1-year period. Patients who were not continuously enrolled in a plan for 2 years prior to their hysterectomy were excluded.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Proportion of women undergoing hysterectomy in each plan for inappropriate clinical reasons according to ratings derived from a panel of managed care physicians.

Results.
—Overall, about 16% of women underwent hysterectomy for reasons judged to be clinically inappropriate. Only one plan had significantly more hysterectomies rated inappropriate compared with the group mean (27%, unadjusted). Adjusting for age and race did not affect the rankings of the plans and had little effect on the numeric results.

Conclusion.
—The rates of inappropriate use of hysterectomies are similar to those for other procedures and vary to a small degree among health plans. This information may be useful to purchasers when they consider which health plans to offer their employees.

(JAMA. 1993;269:2398-2402)



Author Affiliations

AV-MED, Gainesville, Fla; CIGNA Health-plans, Bloomfield, Conn; Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Wash; Harvard Community Health Plan, Brookline, Mass; The Health Care Plan of Buffalo (NY); The Health Plan of America, Orange, Calif; Kaiser Permanente, Colorado Region, Denver; Kaiser Permanente, Northwest Region, Portland, Ore; Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Region, Pasadena, Calif; MedCenters Health Plan, Minneapolis, Minn; United HealthCare Corporation, Minneapolis, Minn

From RAND, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Bernstein, McGlynn, Siu, and Brook, and Ms Keesey); the Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Bernstein); the Schools of Medicine (Drs Siu, Kosecoff, and Brook) and Public Health (Dr Brook), UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif; Value Health Sciences, Santa Monica, Calif (Ms Roth and Drs Sherwood and Kosecoff); and the Department of Public Health Medicine, Oxfordshire Health Authority, Oxford, England (Dr Hicks).


Footnotes

A complete list of the members of the Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium appears at the end of this article.

Reprint requests to RAND, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 (Dr McGlynn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in Lebanon: implications for health policy
Sibai et al.
Health Policy Plan 2008;23:210-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient preferences can be misleading as explanations for racial disparities in health care.
Armstrong et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:950-954.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Hysterectomy vs Medical Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life and Sexual Functioning: The Medicine or Surgery (Ms) Randomized Trial
Kuppermann et al.
JAMA 2004;291:1447-1455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Acuity following Cataract Surgeries in Relation to Preoperative Appropriateness Ratings
Tobacman et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:122-130.
ABSTRACT  

Hysterectomy Prevalence by Hispanic Ethnicity: Evidence From a National Survey
Brett and Higgins
AJPH 2003;93:307-312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medicine and Professionalism
Barondess
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:145-149.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Quality, Minimizing Error: Making It Happen
Becher and Chassin
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:68-81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Continuing Quest for Measuring and Improving Access to Necessary Care
Hannan
JAMA 2000;284:2374-2376.
FULL TEXT  

Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience
Marshall et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2000;9:53-57.
FULL TEXT  

Outcomes Improvement: The True Mark of Quality in Managed Care
Armstead and Leong
American Journal of Medical Quality 1999;14:202-210.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnoses of Patients Treated With ECT: A Comparison of Evidence-Based Standards With Reported Use
Hermann et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:1059-1065.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care Quality: Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality
Chassin et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1000-1005.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical Procedures
Shekelle et al.
NEJM 1998;338:1888-1895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the Quality of Care- Part Three of Six
Chassin
NEJM 1996;335:1060-1063.
FULL TEXT  

Cost Sharing in Health Insurance
Rubin et al.
NEJM 1995;333:733-734.
FULL TEXT  

Indications for Hysterectomy: Variation within and Across Hospitals
Arndt et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1995;52:342-363.
ABSTRACT  

Site-to-Site Variation in the Factors Affecting Cesarean Section Rates
Hueston
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:346-351.
ABSTRACT  

Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care
Hicks
BMJ 1994;309:730-733.
FULL TEXT  

Eleven Worthy Aims for Clinical Leadership of Health System Reform
Berwick
JAMA 1994;272:797-802.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring the Quality of Care: Reforming the Health Care System
Longo and Daugird
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Appropriateness Studies
Black et al.
NEJM 1994;330:432-434.
FULL TEXT  

The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Phelps
NEJM 1993;329:1241-1245.
FULL TEXT  

Hysterectomy, HMOs, and Appropriateness
Davidson
JAMA 1993;270:1317-1317.
ABSTRACT  

Indications for Hysterectomy
Oldenhave et al.
NEJM 1993;329:275-276.
FULL TEXT  

RATES OF INAPPROPRIATE HYSTERECTOMY
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.