You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 24, June 23, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Organ procurement expenditures and the role of financial incentives

R. W. Evans
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

OBJECTIVES--To evaluate the billed charges for organ procurement and to consider the role of financial incentives to encourage organ donation. DESIGN--Observational study. Data were obtained on donor organ acquisition charges from a random sample of kidney, heart, liver, heart-lung, and pancreas transplants. SETTING--The data were based on 28.7% of all transplants performed in the United States in 1988. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Total charges for donor organ acquisition. RESULTS--The median charges (1988 dollars) for donor organs were as follows: kidney, $12,290; heart, $12,578; liver, $16,281; heart-lung, $12,028; and pancreas, $15,400. Since 1983, kidney acquisition charges have increased by 12.9%, heart charges by 64.1%, and liver charges by 61.8%, after adjusting for inflation. Between 9% and 31% of total transplant procedure-specific charges were associated with donor organ acquisition. CONCLUSIONS--There is wide unexplained variation in organ procurement charges. Data on actual costs are required to establish the appropriateness of current charges. Prevailing billing and payment methods should be reevaluated in an effort to address a variety of issues related to reimbursement. Current payment methods may actually contribute to cost inefficiency. Finally, while financial incentives may enhance the efficiency of organ procurement efforts, they will adversely affect the cost-effectiveness of transplantation.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A cost comparison of heart transplantation versus alternative operations for cardiomyopathy
Cope et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:1298-1305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Centralization of Histocompatibility Laboratories: Impact on Organ Allocation Efficiency and Outcomes of Cadaveric Renal Transplantation
Solit et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1998;13:85-88.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Repeat Medical Procedures: Kidney Transplantation as an Example
Hornberger et al.
Med Decis Making 1997;17:363-372.
ABSTRACT  

Procurement and Allocation of Solid Organs for Transplantation
Hauptman and O'Connor
NEJM 1997;336:422-431.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.