You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 24, June 23, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of MEDLINE by Physicians for Clinical Problem Solving

Donald A. B. Lindberg, MD; Elliot R. Siegel, PhD; Barbara A. Rapp, PhD; Karen T. Wallingford, MLS; Sandra R. Wilson, PhD

JAMA. 1993;269(24):3124-3129.


Abstract

Objective.
—To understand the ways in which computer-mediated searching of the biomedical literature affects patient care and other professional activities. Undertaken to determine the ways in which on-line access to the biomedical literature via the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database "makes a difference" in what physicians do when confronted with a medical problem requiring new or additional information.

Design.
—An adaptation of the Critical Incident Technique used to gather detailed reports of MEDLINE search results that were especially helpful (or not helpful) in carrying out the individual's professional activities. The individual physician was the source of the patient care incident reports. One thousand one hundred fifty-eight reports were systematically analyzed from three different perspectives: (1) why the information was sought; (2) the effect of having (or not having) the needed information on professional decisions and actions; and (3) the outcome of the search.

Participants and Setting.
—Telephone interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of 552 physicians, scientists, and other professionals working in a variety of clinical care and other settings. Of these, 65% were direct users of MEDLINE throughout the United States, and 35% had MEDLINE searches conducted for them either at a major health sciences center or in community hospitals.

Results.
—Three comprehensive and detailed inventories that describe the motivation for the searches, how search results affected the actions and decisions of the individual who initiated the search, and how they affected the outcome of the situation that motivated the search.

Conclusions.
—MEDLINE searches are being carried out by and for physicians to meet a wide diversity of clinical information needs. Physicians report that in situations involving individual patients, rapid access to the biomedical literature via MEDLINE is at times critical to sound patient care and favorably influences patient outcomes.

(JAMA. 1993;269:3124-3129)



Author Affiliations

From the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Md (Drs Lindberg, Siegel, and Rapp, and Ms Wallingford), and the American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, Calif (Dr Wilson).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 (Dr Siegel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Critique of the critical incident technique
Sharoff
Journal of Research in Nursing 2008;13:301-309.
ABSTRACT  

Patient-Care Questions that Physicians Are Unable to Answer
Ely et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:407-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources for Answering Primary Care Physicians' Information Needs
McKibbon and Fridsma
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:653-659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions?
Westbrook et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:315-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? a study of 55,000 clinicians
Westbrook et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:113-120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Clinicians Use Online Evidence to Support Patient Care? A Study of 55,000 Clinicians
Westbrook et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11:113-120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics: Collaborations on the Road to Genomic Medicine?
Maojo and Kulikowski
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:515-522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics: Collaborations on the Road to Genomic Medicine?
Maojo and Kulikowski
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10:515-522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Information technology for quality health care: a summary of United Kingdom and United States experiences
Detmer
Qual Saf Health Care 2000;9:181-189.
FULL TEXT  

A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study
Ely et al.
BMJ 2000;321:429-432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Realizing the Promise: Delivering Pulmonary Continuing Medical Education Over the Internet
Peterson et al.
Chest 1999;115:1429-1436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Basis for Using the Internet to Support the Information Needs of Primary Care
Westberg and Miller
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1999;6:6-25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Well Do Physicians Use Electronic Information Retrieval Systems?: A Framework for Investigation and Systematic Review
Hersh and Hickam
JAMA 1998;280:1347-1352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 24-1998- A 76-Year-Old Woman with Cardiac and Renal Failure and Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Wong and Compton
NEJM 1998;339:329-337.
FULL TEXT  

An Industrial Process View of Information Delivery to Support Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Systems Design and Process Measures
Elson et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1997;4:266-278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Learning and Teaching in Dermatology: A Practitioner's Guide
Brodell et al.
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:946-952.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians Accessing the Internet, the PAI Project: An Educational Initiative
Chi-Lum et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1361-1362.
ABSTRACT  

On-line Resources for Pediatricians
Spooner
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1160-1168.
ABSTRACT  

Computers in Medicine
Lindberg and Humphreys
JAMA 1995;273:1667-1668.
ABSTRACT  

Understanding and Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Vocabulary to Perform Literature Searches
Lowe and Barnett
JAMA 1994;271:1103-1108.
ABSTRACT  

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: I. How to Get Started
Oxman et al.
JAMA 1993;270:2093-2095.
ABSTRACT  

Using MEDLINE to Solve Clinical Problems
Fink
JAMA 1993;270:2053-2053.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.