You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 3, January 20, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Elective Cyclosporine Withdrawal After Renal Transplantation

A Meta-analysis

Bertram L. Kasiske, MD; Karen Heim-Duthoy, PharmD; Jennie Z. Ma, MS

JAMA. 1993;269(3):395-400.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine whether it is safe to electively discontinue cyclosporine therapy after renal transplantation.

Data Source.
—MEDLINE and bibliographies from recent publications.

Study Selection.
—Controlled trials assessing the rate of acute rejection, graft loss, and mortality after elective cyclosporine withdrawal.

Data Extraction.
—We compared outcomes in patients who underwent withdrawal from cyclosporine treatment with patients who were not withdrawn (part 1), and in a separate analysis (part 2), with patients who never received cyclosporine.

Data Synthesis.
—In part 1 of the meta-analysis, consisting of 10 randomized and seven nonrandomized trials, there was a greater combined rate of acute rejection among patients in whom cyclosporine was withdrawn compared with control patients who continued to receive cyclosporine (weighted difference in episodes per patient, 126; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.085 to 0.167; P<.001). However, there were no differences in graft loss (weighted difference in grafts lost per patient per year, —0.009; 95% Cl, —0.022 to 0.004; P=0.19) or mortality (weighted difference in deaths per patient per year, —0.005; 95% Cl, —0.016 to 0.006; P=.40) attributable to cyclosporine withdrawal. In part 2 of the meta-analysis, consisting of three randomized and three nonrandomized trials, the combined rate of graft loss for patients who were withdrawn from cyclosporine was not significantly different vs control patients who never received cyclosporine (weighted difference in grafts lost per patient per year, —0.020; 95% Cl, —0.043 to 0.003; P=.08). However, when the three randomized trials were analyzed separately, graft survival was better in patients who were withdrawn from cyclosporine (weighted difference in grafts lost per patient per year, 0.0382; 95% Cl, 0.0002 to 0.0762; P=.049). None of the outcomes was affected by the timing or manner of the cyclosporine withdrawal.

Conclusions.
—The increased incidence of acute rejection following elective cyclosporine withdrawal does not affect short-term graft or patient survival after renal transplantation. Whether long-term consequences will outweigh the benefits of elective withdrawal remains to be determined.

(JAMA. 1993;269:395-400)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine (Dr Kasiske); the Drug Evaluation Unit, College of Pharmacy (Ms Heim-Duthoy); and the Regional Kidney Disease Program (Ms Ma), Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55415 (Dr Kasiske).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Minimizing Immunosuppression, an Alternative Approach to Reducing Side Effects: Objectives and Interim Result
Srinivas and Meier-Kriesche
CJASN 2008;3:S101-S116.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Renal Transplantation: Can We Reduce Calcineurin Inhibitor/Stop Steroids? Evidence Based on Protocol Biopsy Findings
Gotti et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003;14:755-766.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Open Randomized Trial Comparing Early Withdrawal of either Cyclosporine or Mycophenolate Mofetil in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients Initially Treated with a Triple Drug Regimen
Schnuelle et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:536-543.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies
Ioannidis et al.
JAMA 2001;286:821-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Meta-Analysis of Immunosuppression Withdrawal Trials in Renal Transplantation
KASISKE et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000;11:1910-1917.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cyclosporine Avoidance
GAUTHIER and HELDERMAN
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000;11:1933-1936.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.