You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 6, February 10, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State

L. L. Leape, L. H. Hilborne, R. E. Park, S. J. Bernstein, C. J. Kamberg, M. Sherwood and R. H. Brook
RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2398.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. DESIGN--Retrospective randomized medical record review. SETTING--Fifteen randomly selected hospitals in New York State that provide coronary artery bypass graft surgery. PATIENTS--Random sample of 1338 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State in 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Percentage of patients who had bypass surgery for appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain indications; operative (30-day) mortality; and complications. RESULTS--Nearly 91% of the bypass operations were rated appropriate; 7%, uncertain; and 2.4%, inappropriate. This low inappropriate rate differs substantially from the 14% rate found in a previous study of patients operated on in 1979, 1980, and 1982. The difference in rates was not due to more lenient criteria but to changes in practice, the most important being that the fraction of patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafts for one- and two-vessel disease fell from 51% to 24%. Individual hospital rates of inappropriateness (0% to 5%) did not vary significantly. Rates of appropriateness also did not vary by hospital location, volume, or teaching status. Operative mortality was 2.0%; 17% of patients suffered a complication. Complication rates varied significantly among hospitals (P < .01) and were higher in downstate hospitals. CONCLUSIONS--The rates of inappropriate and uncertain use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State were very low. Rates of inappropriate use did not vary significantly among hospitals, or according to region, volume of bypass operations performed, or teaching status.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed in northern New England.
O'Connor et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2323-2328.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in Lebanon: implications for health policy
Sibai et al.
Health Policy Plan 2008;23:210-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Symptom Expression in Coronary Heart Disease and Revascularization Recommendations for Black and White Patients
Hravnak et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:1701-1708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness of total hip joint replacement
Quintana et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:315-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology
Barr et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003;24:2020-2034.
FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness of invasive cardiovascular interventions in German hospitals (2000-2001): an evaluation using the RAND appropriateness criteria
Gandjour et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003;24:571-577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rethinking quality in the context of persons with disability
LAWTHERS et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:287-299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Indications in Interventional Cardiology: Appropriateness and Necessity of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization
Schilling et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2003;18:155-163.
ABSTRACT  

Differential Use of Coronary Revascularization and Hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
Barnhart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:461-466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Population need for coronary revascularisation: are national targets for England credible?
Martin et al.
Heart 2002;88:627-633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Differences in Cardiac Revascularization Rates: Does "Overuse" Explain Higher Rates among White Patients?
Schneider et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:328-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for Revascularization
Hemingway et al.
NEJM 2001;344:645-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: socioeconomic inequalities in access and in 30 day mortality. A population-based study in Rome, Italy
Ancona et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2000;54:930-935.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Continuing Quest for Measuring and Improving Access to Necessary Care
Hannan
JAMA 2000;284:2374-2376.
FULL TEXT  

European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures
Fitch et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2000;18:380-387.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Adult Diagnostic Neuroangiography
Cooperative Study between the ASNR ASITN, and the
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:146-150.
FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden
Bernstein et al.
Heart 1999;81:470-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underuse of Cardiac Procedures: Do Women, Ethnic Minorities, and the Uninsured Fail To Receive Needed Revascularization?
Leape et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:183-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Donohoe
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical Procedures
Shekelle et al.
NEJM 1998;338:1888-1895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Availability of Cardiac Technology: Trends in Procedure Use and Outcomes for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Wright et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:239-254.
ABSTRACT  

Variation among Hospitals in Coronary-Angiography Practices and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in a Large Health Maintenance Organization
Selby et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1888-1896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the Quality of Care- Part Three of Six
Chassin
NEJM 1996;335:1060-1063.
FULL TEXT  

Solo or Partnership
Urschel
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995;60:1473-1475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Report Cards on Cardiac Surgeons -- Assessing New York State's Approach
Green and Wintfeld
NEJM 1995;332:1229-1233.
FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Quality of Care: Reforming the Health Care System
Longo and Daugird
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Appropriateness Studies
Black et al.
NEJM 1994;330:432-434.
FULL TEXT  

The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Phelps
NEJM 1993;329:1241-1245.
FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring It
Kassirer
NEJM 1993;329:1263-1265.
FULL TEXT  

INAPPROPRIATE CARDIAC PROCEDURES MAY BE DECLINING
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.