You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 6, February 10, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State

L. H. Hilborne, L. L. Leape, S. J. Bernstein, R. E. Park, M. E. Fiske, C. J. Kamberg, C. P. Roth and R. H. Brook
RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2398.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in New York State. DESIGN--Retrospective randomized medical record. SETTING--Fifteen randomly selected hospitals in New York State that provide PTCA. PATIENTS--Random sample of 1306 patients undergoing PTCA in New York State in 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Percentage of patients who underwent PTCA for indications rated appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate. RESULTS--The majority of patients received PTCA for chronic stable angina, unstable angina, and in the post-myocardial infarction period (up to 3 weeks). Fifty-eight percent of PTCAs were rated appropriate; 38%, uncertain; and 4%, inappropriate. The inappropriate rate varied by hospital from 1% to 9% (P = .12); the uncertain rate, from 26% to 50% (P = .02); and the combined inappropriate and uncertain rate, from 29% to 57% (P < .001). There was no difference in appropriateness when the institutions were grouped by volume (fewer than 300 procedures annually or at least 300 procedures annually), location (upstate vs downstate), or by teaching status. CONCLUSIONS--Few PTCAs were performed for inappropriate indications in New York State. However, the large number of procedures performed for indications that were rated uncertain as to their net benefit requires further study and justification at both clinical and policy levels.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computed Tomographic Angiography: More Than Just a Pretty Picture?
Redberg
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1827-1829.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Quality-of-Life Benefit After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Spertus et al.
Circulation 2004;110:3789-3794.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness of invasive cardiovascular interventions in German hospitals (2000-2001): an evaluation using the RAND appropriateness criteria
Gandjour et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003;24:571-577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial comment
Beyersdorf
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003;24:578-579.
FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Indications in Interventional Cardiology: Appropriateness and Necessity of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization
Schilling et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2003;18:155-163.
ABSTRACT  

Visual Acuity following Cataract Surgeries in Relation to Preoperative Appropriateness Ratings
Tobacman et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:122-130.
ABSTRACT  

Differential Use of Coronary Revascularization and Hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
Barnhart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:461-466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Differences in Cardiac Revascularization Rates: Does "Overuse" Explain Higher Rates among White Patients?
Schneider et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:328-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for Revascularization
Hemingway et al.
NEJM 2001;344:645-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation by explicit criteria of the use of total hip joint replacement
Quintana et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:1234-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden
Bernstein et al.
Heart 1999;81:470-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underuse of Cardiac Procedures: Do Women, Ethnic Minorities, and the Uninsured Fail To Receive Needed Revascularization?
Leape et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:183-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Donohoe
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Experiences of Postmenopausal Women with Coronary Artery Disease
LaCharity et al.
West J Nurs Res 1997;19:583-607.
ABSTRACT  

Variation among Hospitals in Coronary-Angiography Practices and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in a Large Health Maintenance Organization
Selby et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1888-1896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Cardiology
Goldman
NEJM 1996;335:1917-1919.
FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Quality of Care: Reforming the Health Care System
Longo and Daugird
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Appropriateness Studies
Black et al.
NEJM 1994;330:432-434.
FULL TEXT  

The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Phelps
NEJM 1993;329:1241-1245.
FULL TEXT  

INAPPROPRIATE CARDIAC PROCEDURES MAY BE DECLINING
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.