You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 6, February 10, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Appropriateness of Use of Coronary Angiography in New York State

Steven J. Bernstein, MD, MPH; Lee H. Hilborne, MD, MPH; Lucian L. Leape, MD; Mary E. Fiske, MD; Rolla Edward Park, PhD; Caren J. Kamberg, MSPH; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD

JAMA. 1993;269(6):766-769.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine the appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in New York State.

Design.
—Retrospective randomized medical record review.

Setting.
—Fifteen randomly selected hospitals in New York State that provide coronary angiography.

Patients.
—Random sample of 1335 patients undergoing coronary angiography in New York State in 1990.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Percentage of patients who underwent coronary angiography for appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate indications.

Results.
—Approximately 76% of coronary angiographies were rated appropriate; 20%, uncertain; and 4%, inappropriate. Inappropriate use did not vary significantly between the elderly (ie, patients aged 65 years and older) and nonelderly, 4.7% and 3.9%, respectively. Although the rate of inappropriate use varied from 0% to 9% among hospitals, the difference was not significant. Rates of appropriateness did not vary by hospital location (upstate vs downstate), volume (fewer than 750 procedures annually or at least 750 procedures annually), teaching status, or whether revascularization was available at the hospital where angiography was performed.

Conclusions.
—Although coronary angiography was used for few inappropriate indications in New York State, many procedures were performed for uncertain indications in which the benefit and risk were approximately equal or unknown.

(JAMA. 1993;269:766-769)



Author Affiliations

From RAND, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Bernstein, Hilborne, Leape, Fiske, Park, and Brook, and Ms Kamberg); the Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Bernstein); the Departments of Medicine (Drs Hilborne and Brook) and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Hilborne), the School of Medicine (Drs Hilborne and Brook) and the School of Public Health (Dr Brook), UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif; and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Leape).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to RAND, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2398 (Dr Bernstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Angiography in Angina: Reliability and Validity
Hemingway et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:221-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in Lebanon: implications for health policy
Sibai et al.
Health Policy Plan 2008;23:210-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Indications in Interventional Cardiology: Appropriateness and Necessity of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization
Schilling et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2003;18:155-163.
ABSTRACT  

Differential Use of Coronary Revascularization and Hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
Barnhart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:461-466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study
Hemingway et al.
Heart 2001;85:672-679.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Scanlon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
FULL TEXT  

Underuse of Cardiac Procedures: Do Women, Ethnic Minorities, and the Uninsured Fail To Receive Needed Revascularization?
Leape et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:183-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical Procedures
Shekelle et al.
NEJM 1998;338:1888-1895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rating the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography -- Do Practicing Physicians Agree with an Expert Panel and with Each Other?
Ayanian et al.
NEJM 1998;338:1896-1904.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Application of Treatment Thresholds to Diagnostic-test Evaluation: An Alternative to the Comparison of Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
Moons et al.
Med Decis Making 1997;17:447-454.
ABSTRACT  

The Use and Interpretation of Commercial APC Gene Testing for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Giardiello et al.
NEJM 1997;336:823-827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation among Hospitals in Coronary-Angiography Practices and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in a Large Health Maintenance Organization
Selby et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1888-1896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association Between Local Diagnostic Testing Intensity and Invasive Cardiac Procedures
Wennberg et al.
JAMA 1996;275:1161-1164.
ABSTRACT  

Relationship of Anatomic Disease to Appropriateness Ratings of Coronary Angiography
Noonan et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1209-1213.
ABSTRACT  

The Appropriateness of Use of Cardiovascular Procedures in Women and Men
Bernstein et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2759-2765.
ABSTRACT  

The Appropriateness of Coronary Procedures in Sweden
Bernstein
JAMA 1994;272:1254-1255.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Between Canada and New York State
McGlynn et al.
JAMA 1994;272:934-940.
ABSTRACT  

Variation in Practice for Discretionary Admissions: Impact on Estimates of Quality of Hospital Care
Miller et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1493-1498.
ABSTRACT  

The Appropriateness of Performing Coronary Angiography and Coronary Artery Revascularization in a Swedish Population
Bengtson et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1260-1265.
ABSTRACT  

Health System Reform: A Provider or a Patient Perspective?
Mirvis
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:241-245.
ABSTRACT  

The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical Care
Phelps
NEJM 1993;329:1241-1245.
FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring It
Kassirer
NEJM 1993;329:1263-1265.
FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in New York State
Reich
JAMA 1993;270:1812-1812.
ABSTRACT  

Maintaining Hospital Quality: The Need for International Cooperation
Brook
JAMA 1993;270:985-987.
ABSTRACT  

INAPPROPRIATE CARDIAC PROCEDURES MAY BE DECLINING
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

The Appropriateness of Use of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in New York State
Leape et al.
JAMA 1993;269:753-760.
ABSTRACT  

The Appropriateness of Use of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in New York State
Hilborne et al.
JAMA 1993;269:761-765.
ABSTRACT  

Toward Fewer Procedures and Better Outcomes
Schoenbaum
JAMA 1993;269:794-796.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.