You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 6, February 10, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Privacy Beliefs and the Violent Family

Extending the Ethical Argument for Physician Intervention

Nancy S. Jecker, PhD

JAMA. 1993;269(6):776-780.


Abstract

Privacy beliefs associated with the family impede physicians' response to domestic violence. As a private sphere, the family is regarded as sacred, separate, and hidden from public view. Hence, physicians who look for or uncover violence in the family risk defiling a sacred object and violating norms of noninterference. Privacy beliefs also obfuscate the ethical analysis of physicians' duties to intercede on behalf of battered patients. Ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence have been invoked to justify physicians' duties to abused patients; however, the principle of justice has not been invoked. Ethical analysis of physicians' duties in this area must be broadened to include the principle of justice. Justice is at stake because establishing conditions favorable to self-respect is a requirement of justice, and the response physicians make to battered patients carries important ramifications for supporting patients' self-respect and dignity. If justice forms part of the ethical foundation for physician intervention in domestic violence, mandatory steps that do not transgress the confidentiality of the physician-patient relationship or infringe the patient's autonomy should be taken, such as requiring domestic violence training in medical education and following treatment plans and protocols to identify abuse and provide assistance to battered patients.

(JAMA. 1993;269:776-780)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to University of Washington, School of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, SB-20, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Jecker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Related Surveillance Data on Violence Against Women: State and Local Sources
WALLER et al.
Violence Against Women 2000;6:868-903.
ABSTRACT  

Violence, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse in Patients Who Are Seen in Primary Care Settings
Wyshak and Modest
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:441-447.
ABSTRACT  

Laws Mandating Reporting of Domestic Violence: Do They Promote Patient Well-being?
Hyman et al.
JAMA 1995;273:1781-1787.
ABSTRACT  

Privacy Beliefs and the Violent Family
Baughan
JAMA 1993;269:2986-2986.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.