You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 9, March 3, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Utility and Cost-effectiveness of an Air Suspension Bed in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers

Kevin J. Inman, MSc; William J. Sibbald, MD, FRCPC, FCCP; Frank S. Rutledge, MD, FRCPC; Barbara J. Clark, RN, BScN

JAMA. 1993;269(9):1139-1143.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine, in critically ill patients at risk, both the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using an air suspension bed in the prevention of pressure ulcers.

Design.
—Randomized, parallel group, controlled clinical trial with accompanying cost-effectiveness analysis.

Setting.
—30-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit.

Patients.
—100 consecutive patients at risk for the development of pressure ulcers randomly assigned to receive treatment on either an air suspension bed or a standard intensive care unit bed. Patients considered at risk were those at least 17 years of age with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score greater than 15 who had an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 3 days.

Main Outcome Measures.
—The development of pressure ulcers by site and severity and the costs associated with each of the two programs.

Results.
—The air suspension bed was associated with fewer patients developing single, multiple, or severe pressure ulcers. In patients at risk, the use of an air suspension bed in the prevention of pressure ulcers was a cost-effective therapy.

Conclusions.
—Despite intense nursing care, pressure ulcers are more prevalent in the critically ill patient population than in the general hospital population. Air suspension therapy provides a clinically effective means of preventing pressure ulcers in these patients. In patients at risk, air suspension therapy was a cost-effective means of managing pressure ulcers compared with the standard hospital bed.

(JAMA. 1993;269:1139-1143)



Author Affiliations

From the Richard Ivey Critical Care Trauma Centre and the Management and Evaluative Research Group, Victoria Hospital Corp, and the Program in Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Management and Evaluative Research Group, Victoria Hospital Corp, Room 482 NW, 375 South St, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4G5 (Mr Inman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Extrinsic Risk Factors for Pressure Ulcers Early in the Hospital Stay: A Nested Case-Control Study
Baumgarten et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2008;63:408-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obesity Reduces the Risk of Pressure Ulcers in Elderly Hospitalized Patients
Compher et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007;62:1310-1312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review.
Reddy et al.
JAMA 2006;296:974-984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Lyder
JAMA 2003;289:223-226.
FULL TEXT  

Understanding Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Critical Care . Report from the Second American Thoracic Society Workshop on Outcomes Research
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:540-550.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Issues and Dilemmas in the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Review
Thomas
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2001;56:M328-M340.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Ontario Health Care Evaluation Network and the Critical Care Research Network as Vehicles for Research Transfer
Sibbald and Kossuth
Med Decis Making 1998;18:9-16.
ABSTRACT  

A Phase II Study to Evaluate Recombinant Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB in the Treatment of Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Ulcers
Mustoe et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:213-219.
ABSTRACT  

Pressure Ulcer Prevention With Low-Air-Loss Beds
Verdery
JAMA 1993;270:1197-1197.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.