You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 1, July 7, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Understanding Patients' Decisions

Cognitive and Emotional Perspectives

Donald A. Redelmeier, MD; Paul Rozin, PhD; Daniel Kahneman, PhD

JAMA. 1993;270(1):72-76.


Abstract

Objective.
—To describe ways in which intuitive thought processes and feelings may lead patients to make suboptimal medical decisions.

Design.
—Review of past studies from the psychology literature.

Results.
—Intuitive decision making is often appropriate and results in reasonable choices; in some situations, however, intuitions lead patients to make choices that are not in their best interests. People sometimes treat safety and danger categorically, undervalue the importance of a partial risk reduction, are influenced by the way in which a problem is framed, and inappropriately evaluate an action by its subsequent outcome. These strategies help explain examples where risk perceptions conflict with standard scientific analyses. In the domain of emotions, people tend to consider losses as more significant than the corresponding gains, are imperfect at predicting future preferences, distort their memories of past personal experiences, have difficulty resolving inconsistencies between emotions and rationality, and worry with an intensity disproportionate to the actual danger. In general, such intangible aspects of clinical care have received little attention in the medical literature.

Conclusion.
—We suggest that an awareness of how people reason is an important clinical skill that can be promoted by knowledge of selected past studies in psychology.

(JAMA. 1993;270:72-76)



Author Affiliations

From the University of Toronto (Ontario) and the Wellesley Hospital Research Institute (Dr Redelmeier); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Rozin); and the University of California, Berkeley (Dr Kahneman).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Wellesley Hospital Research Institute, Jones Bldg, Room 123,160 Wellesley St E, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4Y 1J3 (Dr Redelmeier).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Why Does Informed Consent Fail? A Discourse Analytic Approach
Ness et al.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2009;37:349-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene Therapy and Informed Consent Decision Making: Nursing Research Directions
Kaspar et al.
Biol Res Nurs 2009;11:98-107.
ABSTRACT  

Worth the Risk? Relationship of Incentives to Risk and Benefit Perceptions and Willingness to Participate in Schizophrenia Research
Dunn et al.
Schizophr Bull 2009;35:730-737.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Perspective on the Patient's Role in Treatment Decisions
Sepucha and Mulley
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:53S-74S.
ABSTRACT  

Parents' Concern About Their Own and Their Children's Genetic Disease Risk: Potential Effects of Family History vs Genetic Test Results
Tarini et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:1079-1083.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Titrating Guidance: A Model to Guide Physicians in Assisting Patients and Family Members Who Are Facing Complex Decisions
Goldstein et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1733-1739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Putting risk into context
Drife
The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 2007;9:42-47.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Choice is yours: A psychodynamic exploration of health policymaking and its consequences for the English National Health Service
Fotaki
Human Relations 2006;59:1711-1744.
ABSTRACT  

Answering the Question: "Doctor, if This Were Your Child, What Would You Do?"
Kon
Pediatrics 2006;118:393-397.
FULL TEXT  

Prioritizing and stopping prescription medicines.
Alexander et al.
CMAJ 2006;174:1083-1084.
FULL TEXT  

Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
G. Holloway et al.
JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sufficiently Important Difference: Expanding the Framework of Clinical Significance
Barrett et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:250-261.
ABSTRACT  

The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?
Blennborn et al.
Hum Reprod 2005;20:1292-1297.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimistic Bias in the Perception of Personal Risk: Patterns in Schizophrenia
Prentice et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:507-512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Look Back...and Ahead
Helfand
Med Decis Making 2005;25:8-10.
 

The Application of the Heuristic-Systematic Processing Model to Treatment Decision Making about Prostate Cancer
Steginga and Occhipinti
Med Decis Making 2004;24:573-583.
ABSTRACT  

Theory about Heuristic Strategies Based on Verbal Protocol Analysis: The Emperor Needs a Shave
Hamm
Med Decis Making 2004;24:681-686.
ABSTRACT  

Alternative Medicine or "Alternative" Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patient-Oriented Decision-Making Processes with Respect to Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Caspi et al.
Med Decis Making 2004;24:64-79.
ABSTRACT  

Television Viewing and Risk of Obesity
Redelmeier and Stanbrook
JAMA 2003;290:332-332.
FULL TEXT  

Task Force #4--adherence issues and behavior changes: achieving a long-term solution
Ockene et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:630-640.
FULL TEXT  

Risk Charts: Putting Cancer in Context
Woloshin et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:799-804.
FULL TEXT  

Problems for clinical judgement: 5. Principles of influence in medical practice
Redelmeier and Cialdini
CMAJ 2002;166:1680-1684.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serial Assessment of Mortality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Algorithm and Intuition: Certainty, Uncertainty, and Informed Consent
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2002;109:878-886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Framing as Gain versus Loss on Understanding and Hypothetical Treatment Choices: Survival and Mortality Curves
Armstrong et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:76-83.
ABSTRACT  

Seniors' Preferences for Cancer Screening and Medication Use Based on Absolute Risk Reduction
Murphy et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2002;57:M100-105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Physician-Patient Communication
Lee et al.
ASH Education Book 2002;2002:464-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments
Lloyd
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:i14-18.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stability of Patients' Preferences for Chemotherapy: The Impact of Experience
Jansen et al.
Med Decis Making 2001;21:295-306.
ABSTRACT  

Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients: A Framework for Individualized Decision Making
Walter and Covinsky
JAMA 2001;285:2750-2756.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Analysis with Cumulative Prospect Theory
Bayoumi and Redelmeier
Med Decis Making 2000;20:404-411.
ABSTRACT  

The new alchemy: transmuting information into knowledge in an electronic age
Jadad and Enkin
CMAJ 2000;162:1826-1828.
FULL TEXT  

Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling
Elwyn et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2000;37:135-138.
FULL TEXT  

Unstable Preferences:: A Shift in Valuation or an Effect of the Elicitation Procedure?
Jansen et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:62-71.
ABSTRACT  

Framing Effects in Choices between Multioutcome Life-expectancy Lotteries
Bernstein et al.
Med Decis Making 1999;19:324-338.
ABSTRACT  

The Doctor-Proxy Relationship: Perception and Communication
Zeleznik et al.
J Law Med Ethics 1999;27:13-19.
 

Subjective versus statistical model assessment of mortality risk in open heart surgical procedures
Pons et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999;67:635-640.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rating Health Information on the Internet: Navigating to Knowledge or to Babel?
Jadad and Gagliardi
JAMA 1998;279:611-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protective and Damaging Effects of Stress Mediators
McEwen
NEJM 1998;338:171-179.
FULL TEXT  

Preferences of Pregnant Women and Physicians for 2 Strategies for Prevention of Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis in Neonates
Peralta-Carcelen et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:712-718.
ABSTRACT  

Allocating Health Care: Cost-Utility Analysis, Informed Democratic Decision Making, or the Veil of Ignorance?
Goold
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1996;21:69-98.
ABSTRACT  

In the Eye of the Beholder
Hux and Naylor
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2277-2280.
ABSTRACT  

Communicating the Benefits of Chronic Preventive Therapy: Does the Format of Efficacy Data Determine Patients' Acceptance of Treatment?
Hux and Naylor
Med Decis Making 1995;15:152-157.
ABSTRACT  

Deciding About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Contributions of Decision Analysis
Sorum
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:513-521.
ABSTRACT  

Medical Decision Making in Situations That Offer Multiple Alternatives
Redelmeier and Shafir
JAMA 1995;273:302-305.
ABSTRACT  

Effective Health Message Design: The America Responds to AIDS Campaign
RATZAN et al.
American Behavioral Scientist 1994;38:294-309.
ABSTRACT  

Developing and Testing a Multimedia Presentation of a Health-state Description
Goldstein et al.
Med Decis Making 1994;14:336-344.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Decision Making
Shapiro and Muskin
JAMA 1993;270:2432-2432.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.