You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 14, October 13, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Do the Poor Sue More?

A Case-Control Study of Malpractice Claims and Socioeconomic Status

Helen R. Burstin, MD, MPH; William G. Johnson, PhD; Stuart R. Lipsitz, ScD; Troyen A. Brennan, MD, JD, MPH

JAMA. 1993;270(14):1697-1701.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate whether socioeconomic status is associated with risk of malpractice claims, particularly among those who have suffered medical injury.

Design.
—Case-control study.

Setting.
—Fifty-one hospitals in New York State.

Methods.
—The presence and severity of medical injury, defined as disability at the time of discharge or prolongation of the hospitalization caused by medical treatment as opposed to the disease process, were assessed through review of approximately 31 000 hospital records in New York in 1984. These sampled records were then linked to formal malpractice claims. To estimate the risk of malpractice claims by age, gender, race, insurance status, and income, we conducted a case-control study of claimant cases matched with nonclaimant controls. The cases were all those patients who filed malpractice claims referring to alleged malpractice during a sampled hospitalization. Physician reviewers had previously judged the level of disability that resulted from the medical injury. Claimants (n=51) were each matched with five nonclaimant controls on the basis of injury. Noninjured cases were matched with noninjured controls and injured cases were matched with injured controls.

Results.
—We found that poor patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.03 to 0.8) and uninsured patients (OR, 0.1; 95% Cl, 0.005 to 0.9) were significantly less likely to file malpractice claims, after controlling for the severity of medical injury. Among patients who suffered medical injury, the elderly (OR, 0.2; 95% Cl, 0.03 to 0.9) were also less likely to file claims. Gender and race were not independently associated with risk of malpractice claims.

Conclusions.
—Poor and uninsured patients are significantly less likely to sue for malpractice, even after controlling for the presence of medical injury. Fear of malpractice risk should not be a significant factor in the decision to serve the poor. Tort reforms that would protect physicians who serve the medically indigent from malpractice suits may not be warranted.

(JAMA. 1993;270:1697-1701)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Drs Burstin and Brennan) and Departments of Biostatistics (Dr Lipsitz) and Health Policy and Management (Dr Brennan), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass, and the School of Health Administration and Policy, Arizona State University, Tempe (Dr Johnson).


Footnotes

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Washington, DC, May 1, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Brennan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.
Bismark et al.
CMAJ 2006;175:889-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims.
Gandhi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:488-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events
Bismark et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:17-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

No-Fault Compensation In New Zealand: Harmonizing Injury Compensation, Provider Accountability, And Patient Safety
Bismark and Paterson
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:278-283.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical-Legal Aspects of Informed Consent in Orthopaedic Surgery
Bhattacharyya et al.
JBJS 2005;87:2395-2400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between tort claims and patient incident reports in the Veterans Health Administration
Schmidek and Weeks
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:117-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liability Implications of Physician-Directed Care Coordination
Hall et al.
Ann Fam Med 2005;3:115-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical-Legal Aspects of Compartment Syndrome
Bhattacharyya and Vrahas
JBJS 2004;86:864-868.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Financial Pressures Spur Physician Entrepreneurialism
Pham et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:70-81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unfinished Business: How Litigation Relates to Health Care Regulation
Sage
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003;28:387-420.
ABSTRACT  

Analysis of Medication-Related Malpractice Claims: Causes, Preventability, and Costs
Rothschild et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2414-2420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Complaints and Risk of Being Sued
Graham et al.
JAMA 2002;288:1585-1586.
FULL TEXT  

Compensation for Medical Injury in New Zealand: Does "No-Fault" Increase the Level of Claims Making and Reduce Social and Clinical Selectivity?
Davis et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002;27:833-854.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Access to Care for the Underserved: State-Supported Volunteerism as a Successful Component
Barnhill et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2177-2181.
FULL TEXT  

Tort Claims Analysis in the Veterans Health Administration for Quality Improvement
Weeks et al.
J Law Med Ethics 2001;29:335-345.
 

Medical Mistakes: A Workshop on Personal Perspectives
Penson et al.
The Oncologist 2001;6:92-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians Helping the Underserved: The Reach Out Program
Scott et al.
JAMA 2000;283:99-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Handling Hospital Errors: Is Disclosure the Best Defense?
Wu
ANN INTERN MED 1999;131:970-972.
FULL TEXT  

Iatrogenic Diseases as a Reason for Admission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Causes, and Consequences
Darchy et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:71-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation between Negligent Adverse Events and the Outcomes of Medical-Malpractice Litigation
Brennan et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1963-1967.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Book Review: Suing for Medical Malpractice
Brennan
J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:96-100.
 

Do the Poor Sue More?
Kern
JAMA 1994;271:504-504.
ABSTRACT  

Do the Poor Sue More?
Saitz
JAMA 1994;271:503-503.
ABSTRACT  

POOR PEOPLE SUE LESS
JWatch General 1993;1993:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Caring for the Poor and Professional Liability: Is There a Need for Tort Reform?
Glasson and Orentlicher
JAMA 1993;270:1740-1741.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.