You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 14, October 13, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Impact of First-Responder Defibrillation in an Urban Emergency Medical Services System

Arthur L. Kellermann, MD, MPH; Bela B. Hackman, MD; Grant Somes, PhD; Timothy K. Kreth, MD; Lindacarol Nail, MSN; Perry Dobyns

JAMA. 1993;270(14):1708-1713.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the impact of adding first-responder defibrillation by firefighters to an existing advanced life-support emergency medical services system.

Design.
—Nonrandomized, controlled clinical trial with periodic crossover.

Setting.
—Memphis, Tenn, a city of 610337 people, which is served by a fire department-based emergency medical services system. All city ambulances provide advanced life support.

Patients.
—Adult victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to heart disease.

Intervention.
—Twenty of 40 participating engine companies were equipped with an automated external defibrillator and ordered to apply it immediately in all cases of cardiac arrest. The other 20 companies were ordered to start cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) immediately and wait for paramedics to arrive. Every 75 days, group roles were reversed. Care otherwise proceeded according to 1986 American Heart Association guidelines.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Return of spontaneous circulation in the field, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological status at discharge.

Results.
—During the 39-month study interval, 879 patients were treated by a project engine company. Four hundred thirty-one (49%) of these were found in ventricular fibrillation. Bystander CPR was started in only 12% of cases. Overall, firefighters reached the scene a mean of 2.5 minutes faster than simultaneously dispatched paramedics. Although our automated external defibrillators proved to be reliable and efficacious for terminating ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, patients treated by an automated external defibrillator— equipped engine company were no more likely than CPR-treated controls to be resuscitated (32% vs 34%, respectively), to survive to hospital admission (31% vs 29%), or to survive to hospital discharge (14% vs 10%). Neurological outcomes were also similar in the two treatment groups.

Conclusions.
—In a fast-response, urban emergency medical services system served by paramedics, the impact of adding first-responder defibrillation appears to be small. Early defibrillation alone cannot overcome low community rates of bystander CPR. Careful attention to every link in the "chain of survival" is needed to achieve optimal rates of survival after cardiac arrest.

(JAMA. 1993;270:1708-1713)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Drs Kellermann and Hackman, Ms Nail, and Mr Dobyns) and Cardiology (Drs Hackman and Kreth), Department of Internal Medicine, and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Dr Somes), University of Tennessee, Memphis. Dr Kellermann is now with the Division of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Injury Prevention, School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.


Footnotes

Read in part before the 1992 annual meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, May 29, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Division of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, 69 Butler St SE, Atlanta, GA 30303 (Dr Kellermann).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improved Patient Survival Using a Modified Resuscitation Protocol for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Garza et al.
Circulation 2009;119:2597-2605.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increasing Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation Arrest: Survival Implications of Guideline Changes
Rea et al.
Circulation 2006;114:2760-2765.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of a rule for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Morrison et al.
NEJM 2006;355:478-487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective assessment of integrating the existing emergency medical system with automated external defibrillators fully operated by volunteers and laypersons for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Brescia Early Defibrillation Study (BEDS)
Cappato et al.
Eur Heart J 2006;27:553-561.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Part 3: Defibrillation
Circulation 2005;112:III-17-III-24.
FULL TEXT  

Outcomes After Ventricular Fibrillation Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Expanding the Chain of Survival
Bunch et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:774-782.
ABSTRACT  

Automated External Defibrillators in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Athletics
Coris et al.
Am J Sports Med 2004;32:744-754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defibrillators
Journal of the American Dental Association 2004;135:366-367.
FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest after Successful Early Defibrillation
Bunch et al.
NEJM 2003;348:2626-2633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Automated External Defibrillators: Technical Considerations and Clinical Promise
Takata et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:990-998.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Automated External Defibrillators on Airlines
Groeneveld et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1482-1489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of the Automated External Defibrillator
Marenco et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1193-1200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Shocking Truth About Automated External Defibrillators
Brown and Kellerman
JAMA 2000;284:1438-1441.
FULL TEXT  

Experiences from treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 17 years in Goteborg
Herlitz et al.
Eur Heart J 2000;21:1251-1258.
ABSTRACT  

Emergency cardiac care: introduction
Ewy and Ornato
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:825-880.
FULL TEXT  

Automated external defibrillation: Is survival only a shock away?
Schwartz and Verbeek
CMAJ 2000;162:533-534.
FULL TEXT  

Amiodarone in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Ballew et al.
NEJM 2000;342:216-217.
FULL TEXT  

Improved Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Through the Inexpensive Optimization of an Existing Defibrillation Program: OPALS Study Phase II
Stiell et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1175-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Prior to Defibrillation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation
Cobb et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1182-1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Heart Association Report on the Public Access Defibrillation Conference December 8-10, 1994
Weisfeldt et al.
Circulation 1995;92:2740-2747.
FULL TEXT  

The Impact of First-Responder Defibrillation
Nichol and Stiell
JAMA 1994;271:504-504.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.