You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 22, December 8, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery

W. A. See, C. S. Cooper and R. J. Fisher
Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the relationship between laparoscopic complication rates and surgeon-dependent variables following a laparoscopic training course. DESIGN--Participants were surveyed regarding their interval laparoscopic experience 3 months and 12 months after the course. PARTICIPANTS--Course participants/survey respondents represented a cross section of urologic surgeons in the United States. A total of 181 individuals (61% of 297 participants) completed and returned the 3-month questionnaire. A total of 128 surgeons responded to the 12-month questionnaire (78.5% of 163 participants). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Logistic regression analysis tested the relationship between surgeons' complication rates and study variables. RESULTS--At 3 months, surgeons who performed clinical procedures without additional training were 3.39 times more likely to have at least one complication compared with surgeons who sought additional training (P = .03). At 12 months, surgeons who had attended the training course alone, were in solo practice, or performed laparoscopic surgery with a variable assistant were 4.85, 7.74, and 4.80 times more likely, respectively, to have had a complication than their counterparts who attended the course with a partner, were in group practice, or operated with the same assistant (P = .004, P = .0008, and P = .0015, respectively). At both 3 and 12 months, laparoscopic complication rates of individual surgeons demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with the number of laparoscopic procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS--The rate of complications associated with the clinical learning curve can be decreased by additional education following an initial course in laparoscopy. An ongoing clinical association with surgeons performing similar procedures decreases long-term complication rates.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of the Assistant in Laparoscopic Surgery: Important Considerations for the Apprentice-in-Training
Chiu et al.
SURG INNOV 2008;15:229-236.
ABSTRACT  

Performance analysis of interactive multimodal CME retraining on attitude toward and application of OPCAB
Albert et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006;131:154-162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Training of providers in embryo transfer: what is the minimum number of transfers required for proficiency?
Papageorgiou et al.
Hum Reprod 2001;16:1415-1419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Complications of Laparoscopy: A Follow-Up Finnish Study
HARKKI-SIREN et al.
Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:94-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Experience And Learning Curve Associated With Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
Deschamps et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998;115:281-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CHANGING THE LEARNING CURVE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.