You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 23, December 15, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (155)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer

A Prospective Study

Susan E. Hankinson, ScD; David J. Hunter, MB, BS; Graham A. Colditz, MB, BS; Walter C. Willett, MD; Meir J. Stampfer, MD; Bernard Rosner, PhD; Charles H. Hennekens, MD; Frank E. Speizer, MD

JAMA. 1993;270(23):2813-2818.


Abstract

Objective.
—To assess whether tubal ligation and hysterectomy affect subsequent risk of ovarian cancer.

Design.
—Prospective cohort study with 12 years of follow-up.

Setting.
—United States, multistate.

Participants.
—A total of 121 700 female registered nurses who were 30 to 55 years of age in 1976; the follow-up rate was 90% as of 1988.

Main Outcome Measure.
—Ovarian cancer of epithelial origin confirmed by medical record review.

Results.
—We observed a strong inverse association between tubal ligation and ovarian cancer, which persisted after adjustment for age, oral contraceptive use, parity, and other ovarian cancer risk factors (multivariate relative risk [RR] 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.64). The association was similar when we assessed tubal ligation status at the baseline questionnaire and excluded cases in the first 4 years to eliminate any possible short-term decrease in risk due to screening of the ovaries during ligation surgery. We noted a weaker inverse association between simple hysterectomy and ovarian cancer (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.00). Neither vasectomy nor condom use by a partner was associated with risk of ovarian cancer.

Conclusions.
—These data indicate that tubal ligation, and perhaps hysterectomy, may substantially reduce risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

(JAMA. 1993;270:2813-2818)



Author Affiliations

From the Channing Laboratory (Drs Hankinson, Hunter, Colditz, Willett, Stampfer, Rosner, and Speizer) and the Division of Preventive Medicine (Dr Hennekens), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention (Dr Hennekens), Harvard Medical School; and the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Hankinson, Hunter, Colditz, Willett, and Stampfer) and Nutrition (Dr Willett), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Hankinson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5 279 hysterectomies
Brummer et al.
Hum Reprod 2009;24:2515-2522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reproductive and Hormonal Factors, and Ovarian Cancer Risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study
Antoniou et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:601-610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Criteria for the Evaluation of Large Cohort Studies: An Application to the Nurses' Health Study
Colditz and Winn
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:918-925.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy and Longitudinal CA-125 Screening among Women at Increased Genetic Risk of Ovarian Cancer: Design and Baseline Characteristics: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Greene et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:594-604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Glycosylation Genes with Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Sellers et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:397-404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Oral Contraceptive Use, Other Contraceptive Methods, and Infertility with Ovarian Cancer Risk
Tworoger et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:894-901.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Management Strategies for Ovarian Cancer
Aletti et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:751-770.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Nelson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:362-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Conditions Associated with Antibodies Against the Tumor-Associated Antigen MUC1 and Their Relationship to Risk for Ovarian Cancer
Cramer et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1125-1131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reproductive Issues for Women With BRCA Mutations
Friedman and Kramer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:83-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer of the Ovary
Cannistra
NEJM 2004;351:2519-2529.
FULL TEXT  

Menopausal Symptoms and Psychological Distress in Women With and Without Tubal Sterilization
Wyshak
Psychosomatics 2004;45:403-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation of Contraceptive and Reproductive History to Ovarian Cancer Risk in Carriers and Noncarriers of BRCA1 Gene Mutations
McGuire et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:613-618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tubal sterilization and risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer. A Danish population-based follow-up study of more than 65 000 sterilized women
Kjaer et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:596-602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gynecologic Surgeries and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Ashkenazi Founder Mutations: An Israeli Population-Based Case-Control Study
Rutter et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1072-1078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paradigms for Primary Prevention of Ovarian Carcinoma
Barnes et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:216-225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia trachomatis and cancer
Paavonen
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2001;77:154-156.
FULL TEXT  

Ovarian cancer in Canada
Moloughney et al.
CMAJ 2000;162:690-690.
FULL TEXT  

Prospective Study of Talc Use and Ovarian Cancer
Gertig et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:249-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Possible Role of Ovarian Epithelial Inflammation in Ovarian Cancer
Ness and Cottreau
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1459-1467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Sterilization
Filshie
SURG INNOV 1999;6:112-117.
ABSTRACT  

A 40-Year-Old Woman Considering Contraception
Peterson
JAMA 1998;279:1651-1658.
FULL TEXT  

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Myers
JAMA 1994;271:1235-1235.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Wahlberg
JAMA 1994;271:1236-1236.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Silver
JAMA 1994;271:1235-1235.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Whitmore
JAMA 1994;271:1236-1236.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Lehrer
JAMA 1994;271:1236-1236.
ABSTRACT  

Tubal Ligation May Reduce Ovarian Cancer Risk
Journal Watch Dermatology 1994;1994:14-14.
FULL TEXT  

TUBAL LIGATION LINKED TO A LOWER OVARIAN CANCER RISK
JWatch General 1993;1993:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Prevention of Ovarian Cancer
Grimes
JAMA 1993;270:2855-2856.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.