This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (69)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients in California Hospitals, 1983 to 1989

Harold S. Luft, PhD; Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1993;270(3):331-337.

Abstract
Objective.
—To assess whether risk-adjusted mortality rates for hospitals reflect primarily chance variation.

Design.
—Observation over time.

Setting.
—All 115 California hospitals with five or more coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients in any year 1983 to 1989.

Patients.
—All CABG patients aged 18 years and older excluding those with other open heart procedures and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty on the day of CABG surgery (n=132 750).

Outcome Measure.
—Inpatient mortality adjusted for age, gender, chronic comorbidities, timing of surgery, and presence of additional procedures.

Methods.
—Data were derived from routinely collected hospital discharge abstracts. Observed and expected semiannual mortality rates were examined for each hospital to identify consistent patterns over time. Using the quartile of patients with the highest predicted risk (average mortality, 10%), high- and low-outlier hospitals were identified from 2 consecutive years of pooled data and outcomes 2 years later were examined. Each hospital-year observation was also examined individually to identify outliers and to assess differences for observed and expected death rates, patient volume, and other characteristics.

Results.
—Some hospitals showed consistently lower-than-expected inpatient mortality. Some hospitals had periods of significantly higher-than-expected mortality followed by a correction. High-outlier hospitals that were selected based on 2 years of data had mortality rates 2 years later that averaged 31% above expected, while low-outlier hospitals had rates 2 years later that averaged 28% below expected. On a contemporaneous basis, high outliers had proportionately more transfers to other acute care hospitals and longer postoperative stays among survivors.

Conclusions.
—Risk-adjusted outcomes for CABG patients derived from administrative data exhibit substantial patterns of consistency. Such patterns cannot be detected for low-risk patients but are evident for the top quartile of patients stratified by risk. Even with reporting lags and changes in hospital outcomes over time, a policy of channeling high-risk patients away from high-outlier hospitals and toward low-outlier hospitals could lower the overall risk-adjusted mortality rate by 54%.

(JAMA. 1993;270:331-337)

Author Affiliations
From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Luft); and the Division of General Medicine, University of California, Davis (Dr Romano).

Footnotes
Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of Risk Models in Upholding Standards for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Jollis
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009;2:144-145.
FULL TEXT  

Quality and Consumer Decision Making in the Market for Health Insurance and Health Care Services
Kolstad and Chernew
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:28S-52S.
ABSTRACT  

Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality models to compare the performance of two units after major lung resections
Brunelli et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007;133:88-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Cardiac Surgery Report Cards Reduce Mortality? Assessing the Evidence
Epstein
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:403-426.
ABSTRACT  

Risk-adjusted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue models for internal provider profiling after major lung resection
Brunelli et al.
ICVTS 2006;5:92-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Quality by Simple Case Volume
Kuntz and Normand
Circulation 2005;112:1088-1091.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article
Shahian et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;78:1868-1877.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early and mid-term outcomes of surgery of the ascending aorta/arch: is there a relationship with caseload?
Narayan et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004;25:676-682.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog
Shahian and Normand
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:1048-1058.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Keeping Quality On The Policy Agenda
McGlynn and Brook
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:82-90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation Between Hospital Primary Angioplasty Volume and Mortality for Patients With Acute MI Treated With Primary Angioplasty vs Thrombolytic Therapy
Magid et al.
JAMA 2000;284:3131-3138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictive accuracy study: comparing a statistical model to clinicians' estimates of outcomes after coronary bypass surgery
Ivanov et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000;70:162-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Maintenance Organizations and Hospital Quality for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Escarce et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1999;56:340-362.
ABSTRACT  

Ready-Made, Recalibrated, or Remodeled? : Issues in the Use of Risk Indexes for Assessing Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ivanov et al.
Circulation 1999;99:2098-2104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Research Evidence on the Validity of Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate as a Measure of Hospital Quality of Care
Thomas and Hofer
Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:371-404.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Public Performance Reports: A Survey of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Schneider and Epstein
JAMA 1998;279:1638-1642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Variation in 28-Day Mortality Rates for Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Horbar et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:149-156.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

No Continuous Relationship Between Veterans Affairs Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgical Volume and Operative Mortality
Shroyer et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;61:17-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting
Luft and Parker
BMJ 1995;311:1304b-1305.
FULL TEXT  

Health Care Report Cards: Validity of Case Definitions
Golden et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:976-980.
ABSTRACT  

Regionalization of Cardiac Surgery in the United States and Canada: Geographic Access, Choice, and Outcomes
Grumbach et al.
JAMA 1995;274:1282-1288.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Silber et al.
JAMA 1995;274:317-323.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring the Quality of Care: Reforming the Health Care System
Longo and Daugird
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Mortality: Patient Risk or Physician Practice?
Hartz et al.
JAMA 1993;270:2928-2928.
ABSTRACT  

Can Administrative Data be Used to Compare the Quality of Health Care?
Romano
Med Care Res Rev 1993;50:451-477.
 

VARIATION IN HOSPITAL MORTALITY REFLECTS MORE THAN CHANCE
JWatch General 1993;1993:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

The Missing Ingredient in Health Reform Quality of Care
Chassin
JAMA 1993;270:377-378.
ABSTRACT