You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 270 No. 5, August 4, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Active Morbidity Surveillance After Hurricane Andrew—Florida, 1992

Lore Elizabeth Lee, MPH; Vincent Fonseca, MD, MPH; Kate M. Brett, PhD; Jose Sanchez, MD, MPH; Robert C. Mullen, MPH; Lynn E. Quenemoen, MD, MPH; Samuel L. Groseclose, DVM, MPH; Richard S. Hopkins, MD, MSPH

JAMA. 1993;270(5):591-594.


Abstract

Objective.
—To describe the health status of and to detect disease outbreaks in the population affected by Hurricane Andrew in south Dade County, Florida.

Design.
—The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and the US Army conducted active surveillance for gastrointestinal illness, respiratory illness, injury, and other index conditions by monitoring civilian and service member visits to care sites (civilian and military free care sites and hospital emergency departments) from August 30 (1 week after the hurricane's landfall) through September 30, 1992.

Setting.
—South Dade County, Florida.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Proportional morbidity: the number of daily visits for each index condition divided by the total number of visits, expressed as a percentage. Morbidity rate: the total number of daily visits by service members divided by the total number of service members, expressed as a percentage.

Results.
—Six index conditions accounted for 41.3% of visits to civilian free care sites: diarrhea (4.7%), cough (4.7%), other infection (9.6%), rash (5.4%), animal bite (1.2%), and injury (15.7%). At military free care sites, five index conditions accounted for 75.7% of civilian visits: injury (23.7%), dermatologic illness (12.4%), respiratory illness (9.9%), gastrointestinal illness (5.3%), and other medical conditions (24.4%). Two index conditions accounted for 54.1% of service member visits: injury (36.2%) and dermatologic illness (17.9%). During the 5 weeks after the hurricane, proportional morbidity from injury decreased; proportional morbidity from respiratory illness increased; and proportional morbidity from diarrhea was stable. No infectious disease outbreaks occurred.

Conclusions.
—Injuries were an important source of morbidity throughout the surveillance period, especially among service members. Enteric and respiratory agents did not cause disease outbreaks, despite alarming rumors to the contrary.

(JAMA. 1993;270:591-594)



Author Affiliations

From the Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Field Epidemiology (Ms Lee and Dr Groseclose), the Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, Division of Analysis, National Center for Health Statistics (Dr Brett), and the Health Studies Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health (Dr Quenemoen), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga; the Division of Preventive Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC (Drs Fonseca and Sanchez); and the Epidemiology Program, Office of Disease Control and AIDS Prevention, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee (Mr Mullen and Dr Hopkins). Ms Lee is the Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer assigned to the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.


Footnotes

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to the Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop C-08, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Ms Lee).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Skin Disorders Among Construction Workers Following Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita: An Outbreak Investigation in New Orleans, Louisiana
Noe et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1393-1398.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Task Force II: Indirect and Secondary Cardiovascular Effects of Biological Terrorism Agents and Diseases
Ornato et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1389-1397.
FULL TEXT  

Surveillance for Illness and Injury After Hurricane Katrina--Three Counties, Mississippi, September 5-October 11, 2005
JAMA 2006;295:1994-1996.
FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology of Tropical Cyclones: The Dynamics of Disaster, Disease, and Development
Shultz et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2005;27:21-35.
FULL TEXT  

Emergency Medicine
Sklar
JAMA 1994;271:1665-1666.
ABSTRACT  

Public Health Consequences of a Flood Disaster-- Iowa, 1993
JAMA 1993;270:1406-1408.
 

MORBIDITY FROM HURRICANE ANDREW
JWatch General 1993;1993:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Effective Humanitarian Aid: Our Only Hope for Intervention in Civil War
Cobey et al.
JAMA 1993;270:632-634.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.