You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 13, April 6, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (110)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fecal Occult Blood Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Is Mortality Reduced by Chance Selection for Screening Colonoscopy?

Christopher A. Lang, MD; David F. Ransohoff, MD

JAMA. 1994;271(13):1011-1013.


Abstract

Annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening using rehydrated Hemoccult slides has been reported in the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study to reduce colorectal cancer mortality by about 33%. However, some of the benefit of FOBT screening may come from "chance" selection of persons for colonoscopic examination because of the high positivity rate of FOBT (about 10%) that may occur for reasons other than a bleeding cancer or polyp. To determine how much this mechanism could account for the benefit of FOBT screening, we used a simple mathematical model to simulate the course of a cohort of screened persons, incorporating published data including those from the Minnesota study. The results suggest that one third to one half of the mortality reduction observed from FOBT screening in the Minnesota study may be attributable to chance selection for colonoscopy. We conclude that annual FOBT screening with rehydration is a haphazard method for selecting persons for colonoscopy.

(JAMA. 1994;271:1011-1013)



Author Affiliations

From the Colorado Permanente Medical Group and Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver (Dr Lang), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Ransohoff).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to CB 7105, 5034 Old Clinic Bldg, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7105 (Dr Ransohoff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the department of veterans affairs.
El-Serag et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2202-2208.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 71-Year-Old Woman Contemplating a Screening Colonoscopy
Taylor
JAMA 2006;295:1161-1167.
FULL TEXT  

A Simulation Model for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Potential of Stool Tests with Various Performance Characteristics Compared with Screening Colonoscopy
Haug and Brenner
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:422-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Scientific Review
Walsh and Terdiman
JAMA 2003;289:1288-1296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colonoscopy as a Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer in Average-Risk Individuals
Swaroop and Larson
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:951-956.
ABSTRACT  

Hemoccult should no longer be used for the screening of colorectal cancer
Bleiberg
Ann Oncol 2002;13:44-46.
FULL TEXT  

Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a perspective
Barry
Ann Oncol 2002;13:61-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers
Niv et al.
Gut 2002;50:33-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer: Update of Early Detection Guidelines for Prostate, Colorectal, and Endometrial Cancers: ALSO: Update 2001--Testing for Early Lung Cancer Detection
Smith et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:38-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Fecal Occult-Blood Screening on the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer
Mandel et al.
NEJM 2000;343:1603-1607.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Gazelle et al.
Radiology 2000;215:327-335.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps
Fenlon et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1496-1503.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Rockey
NEJM 1999;341:38-46.
FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Mortality: Effectiveness of Biennial Screening for Fecal Occult Blood
Mandel et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:434-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative Frequency of Upper Gastrointestinal and Colonic Lesions in Patients with Positive Fecal Occult-Blood Tests
Rockey et al.
NEJM 1998;339:153-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should All People over the Age of 50 Have Regular Fecal Occult-Blood Tests?
Simon et al.
NEJM 1998;338:1151-1155.
FULL TEXT  

Fortnightly review: screening for asymptomatic colorectal cancer
Mulcahy et al.
BMJ 1997;314:285-285.
FULL TEXT  

Fecal Occult Blood Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Van Dam et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2389-2402.
ABSTRACT  

Family Medicine
Bowman and Schwenk
JAMA 1995;273:1676-1677.
ABSTRACT  

Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Koff
JAMA 1995;273:1679-1680.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Toribara and Sleisenger
NEJM 1995;332:861-867.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Which Test Is Best?
Sakamoto and Schlumpberger
JAMA 1994;272:1100-1100.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Which Test Is Best?
Pickover
JAMA 1994;272:1099-1100.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.