You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 14, April 13, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Effect of inhalation of hot humidified air on experimental rhinovirus infection

J. O. Hendley, R. D. Abbott, P. P. Beasley and J. M. Gwaltney Jr
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

OBJECTIVE--Nasal inhalation of steam has been proposed as treatment of viral colds on the assumption that increased intranasal temperature will inhibit replication of rhinovirus (RV). The effect of steam inhalation on RV shedding by infected volunteers was examined in this study. DESIGN--Randomized controlled trial. Volunteers experimentally infected with RV were treated with machine-generated humidified air, which was either hot (active) or at room temperature (placebo). Viral shedding was assessed over the 4 days following treatment. SETTING--Local hotel. PARTICIPANTS--Twenty volunteers from the university community who were susceptible to the challenge virus. INTERVENTION--Two 30-minute intranasal treatments, the first at 24 hours after inoculation and the second at 48 hours. The temperature of active vapor was 42 degrees C to 44 degrees C and of placebo vapor was 22 degrees C. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Viral titers in nasal washings on each of 5 days following inoculation. RESULTS--Mean viral titers prior to the first treatment were 10(1.7) tissue culture infectious doses per milliliter in the active group and 10(1.5) in the placebo group. Mean titers for the next 4 days were 10(1.7), and 10(1.7), 10(1.2), and 10(0.9)/mL in the active group and 10(1.8), 10(1.9), 10(1.6), and 10(0.7)/mL in the placebo group (no significant difference). The proportion of volunteers who shed virus on each day was also similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION--Two nasal inhalation treatments with steam had no effect on viral shedding in volunteers with experimental RV colds.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Physician Specialty Is Associated With Differences in the Evaluation and Management of Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
Werning et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:123-130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Picornavirus Infections: A Primer for the Practitioner
Rotbart and Hayden
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:913-920.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hot, Humid Air Partially Inhibits the Nasal Response to Allergen Provocation
Baroody et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:749-754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antiviral Effect of Hyperthermic Treatment in Rhinovirus Infection
Conti et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999;43:822-829.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fortnightly review: Treatment of the common cold
Mossad
BMJ 1998;317:33-36.
FULL TEXT  

Alternative Therapy for Colds
Turow
Pediatrics 1997;100:274-274.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.