Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

K. G. Lurie, J. J. Shultz, M. L. Callaham, T. M. Schwab, T. Gisch, T. Rector, R. J. Frascone and L. Long
Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota-Minneapolis.

OBJECTIVE--Active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appears to improve ventilation and coronary perfusion when compared with standard CPR. The objective was to evaluate potential benefits of this new CPR technique in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in St Paul, Minn. DESIGN--Ten-month, prospective, randomized parallel-group design. SETTING--St Paul, Minn, population 270,000. PATIENTS--All normothermic victims of nontraumatic cardiac arrest older than 8 years who received CPR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Return of spontaneous circulation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), return of baseline neurological function (alert and oriented to person, place, and time), survival to hospital discharge, survival to hospital discharge with return of baseline neurological function, and complications. RESULTS--Seventy-seven patients received standard CPR and 53 patients received ACD CPR. The mean emergency medical services call response interval was less than 3.5 minutes. When all patients were considered, a higher percentage of ACD CPR patients had a return of spontaneous circulation and were admitted to the ICU vs standard CPR (45% vs 31%, and 40% vs 26%, respectively), but these trends were not statistically significant (P < .10 and P < .10). No statistically significant differences were found between hospital discharge rates (12 [23%] of 53 for ACD CPR vs 13 [17%] of 77 for standard CPR), return to baseline neurological function (10 [19%] of 53 for ACD CPR vs 13 [17%] of 77 for standard CPR), or return to baseline neurological function at hospital discharge (nine [17%] of 53 for ACD CPR vs 12 [16%] of 77 for standard CPR). Return of spontaneous circulation, ICU admission, and neurological recovery in both CPR groups were highly correlated with downtime (time from collapse to emergency medical system personnel arrival to the scene in witnessed arrests). With less than 10 minutes' downtime, survival to the ICU was 59% (19/32) with ACD CPR and 33% (16/49) with standard CPR (P < .02), return to baseline neurological function was 31% (10/32) with ACD CPR and 20% (10/49) with standard CPR (P = .27), and hospital discharge rate was 38% (12/32) with ACD CPR and 20% (10/49) with standard CPR (P = .17). Complication rates in patients admitted to the hospital were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS--This study demonstrates that ACD CPR appears to be more effective than standard CPR in a well-defined subset of victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the critical early phases of resuscitation. Based on this study, a larger study should be performed to evaluate the potential long-term benefits of ACD CPR.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recommendations for Implementation of Community Consultation and Public Disclosure Under the Food and Drug Administration's "Exception From Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research": A Special Report From the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Halperin et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1855-1863.
FULL TEXT  

Acute management of sudden cardiac death in adults based upon the new CPR guidelines
Yannopoulos and Aufderheide
Europace 2007;9:2-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Part 6: CPR Techniques and Devices
Circulation 2005;112:IV-47-IV-50.
FULL TEXT  

Medical research in clinical emergency settings in Europe
Lotjonen
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:183-187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inspiratory Impedance During Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation : A Randomized Evaluation in Patients in Cardiac Arrest
Plaisance et al.
Circulation 2000;101:989-994.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Callaham et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1770-1772.
FULL TEXT  

CPR Techniques That Combine Chest and Abdominal Compression and Decompression : Hemodynamic Insights From a Spreadsheet Model
Babbs
Circulation 1999;100:2146-2152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Active Compression-Decompression Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Plaisance et al.
NEJM 1999;341:569-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent advances: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Ballew
BMJ 1997;314:1462-1462.
FULL TEXT  

Benefit of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation as a Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support: A Randomized Multicenter Study
Plaisance et al.
Circulation 1997;95:955-961.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recommended Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Pediatric Advanced Life Support: The Pediatric Utstein Style : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council
Zaritsky et al.
Circulation 1995;92:2006-2020.
FULL TEXT  

ENCOURAGING DATA ON ""TOILET PLUNGER"" CPR
JWatch General 1994;1994:5-5.
FULL TEXT