You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 20, May 25, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators


OBJECTIVE. To assess prospectively the impact on survival and health-related quality of life of two follow-up protocols in patients with early breast cancer. DESIGN. Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING. Multicenter study involving 26 general hospitals in Italy. PATIENTS. A consecutive sample of 1320 women younger than 70 years with stage I, II, and III unilateral primary breast cancer. INTERVENTION. Patients were randomly assigned to an intensive surveillance, which included physician visits and performance of bone scan, liver echography, chest roentgenography, and laboratory tests at predefined intervals (n = 655), or to a control regimen (n = 665), in which patients were seen by their physicians at the same frequency but only clinically indicated tests were performed. Both groups received a yearly mammogram aimed at detecting contralateral breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Primary end points were overall survival and health-related quality of life. RESULTS. Compliance to the two follow-up protocols was more than 80%. At a median follow-up of 71 months, no difference was apparent in overall survival with 132 deaths (20%) in the intensive group and 122 deaths (18%) in the control group. No significant differences were apparent in time to detection of recurrence between the two groups. Measurements of health-related quality of life (ie, overall health and quality-of-life perception, emotional well-being, body image, social functioning, symptoms, and satisfaction with care) at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up did not show differences by type of care received. CONCLUSIONS. Results of this trial support the view that a protocol of frequent laboratory tests and roentgenography after primary treatment for breast cancer does not improve survival or influence health-related quality of life. Routine use of these tests should be discouraged.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging?
Hodgson and Gulenchyn
JCO 2008;26:712-720.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Sonography in the Detection of Contralateral Metachronous Breast Cancer in an Asian Population
Kim et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:476-480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Follow-up of Patients with Early Breast Cancer
Hayes
NEJM 2007;356:2505-2513.
FULL TEXT  

CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials
Keshaviah et al.
Ann Oncol 2007;18:701-708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveillance Testing Among Survivors of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Keating et al.
JCO 2007;25:1074-1081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail: Improving the Quality of Care With Survivorship Care Plans
Earle
JCO 2006;24:5112-5116.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting
Khatcheressian et al.
JCO 2006;24:5091-5097.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: blood will tell.
Sledge
Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:6321-6322.
FULL TEXT  

Geographical Variation in Surveillance Strategies After Curative-Intent Surgery for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer
Johnson et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1063-1071.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serum Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer: Are They of Clinical Value?
Duffy
Clin. Chem. 2006;52:345-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care
Grunfeld et al.
JCO 2006;24:848-855.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of Care in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors in the First Year After Cessation of Active Treatment
Mandelblatt et al.
JCO 2006;24:77-84.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Controlled Trials
Stolberg et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:1539-1544.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Routine Visits and Routine Tests in Detecting Isolated Locoregional Recurrences After Treatment for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
de Bock et al.
JCO 2004;22:4010-4018.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000
Mandelblatt et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004;2004:8-44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bone Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Hamaoka et al.
JCO 2004;22:2942-2953.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Follow-Up for Patients With Colorectal Cancer After Curative-Intent Primary Treatment
Johnson et al.
JCO 2004;22:1363-1365.
FULL TEXT  

Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer
Hiramanek
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:172-176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Detection of Asymptomatic Pulmonary Melanoma Metastases by Routine Chest Radiographs Is Not Associated With Improved Survival
Tsao et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:67-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of 2 Versus 5 Years of Adjuvant Tamoxifen for Women Aged 50 Years or Older With Early Breast Cancer: Italian Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Evaluation Study of Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer 01
Sacco et al.
JCO 2003;21:2276-2281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Role for Curative Surgery in the Treatment of Selected Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
Singletary et al.
The Oncologist 2003;8:241-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ongoing Care of Patients After Primary Treatment for Their Cancer
Kattlove and Winn
CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:172-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?
Loprinzi et al.
JCO 2003;21:108s-111.
FULL TEXT  

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer--Taking Stock
Goodwin et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:263-281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective Evaluation of a Follow-Up Schedule in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: Recommendations for an Effective Follow-Up Strategy
Garbe et al.
JCO 2003;21:520-529.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nurse led follow up and conventional medical follow up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial
Moore et al.
BMJ 2002;325:1145-1145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine chest X-rays have no additional value in the detection of relapse during routine follow-up of patients treated with chemotherapy for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer
Gietema et al.
Ann Oncol 2002;13:1616-1620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Renehan et al.
BMJ 2002;324:813-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer: Assessing the Use of Routine Pelvic CT in Patient Evaluation
Drotman et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:1433-1436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correspondence Re: ""Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?""
Bernhardt et al.
JCO 2000;18:3739-3741.
FULL TEXT  

Routine Chest Roentgenography Is Unnecessary in the Work-Up of Stage I and II Breast Cancer
Chen et al.
JCO 2000;18:3503-3506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care for Survivors of Breast Cancer
Burstein and Winer
NEJM 2000;343:1086-1094.
FULL TEXT  

Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer
Westeel et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000;70:1185-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?
Loprinzi et al.
JCO 2000;18:2345-2348.
FULL TEXT  

Economic Impact of Harmonizing Medical Practices: Compliance With Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Follow-Up of Breast Cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center
Mille et al.
JCO 2000;18:1718-1724.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of nurse-led follow-up in the management of patients with lung cancer
Moore et al.
Journal of Research in Nursing 1999;4:432-445.
ABSTRACT  

Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer
Temple et al.
CMAJ 1999;161:1001-1008.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging and Core-Needle Biopsy in the Preoperative Work-up of Suspicious Breast Lesions
Hrung et al.
Radiology 1999;213:39-49.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enough Is Enough
Harken
Arch Surg 1999;134:1061-1063.
FULL TEXT  

Initial Evaluation of Melanoma: Don't Stop Getting That Chest X-ray . . . Yet.
Kanzler
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1121-1122.
FULL TEXT  

Proposed Agenda for the Measurement of Quality-of-Care Outcomes in Oncology Practice
Mandelblatt et al.
JCO 1999;17:2614-2614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of Italian multiple sclerosis quality of life 54 questionnaire
Solari et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;67:158-162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intensive vs Clinical Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of a Randomized Trial
Palli et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1586-1586.
FULL TEXT  

Stages I–III Follicular Lymphoma: Role of CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis in Follow-up Studies
Oh et al.
Radiology 1999;210:483-486.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Breast Cancer
Hortobagyi
NEJM 1998;339:974-984.
FULL TEXT  

Costs of Posttreatment Surveillance for Patients With Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer
Virgo et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:564-572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Analysis -- Effects of Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy on Life Expectancy among Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations
Schrag et al.
NEJM 1997;336:1465-1471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Study of open access centre for patients with breast cancer is planned
Kirkbride and Vallis
BMJ 1996;313:1547a-1547.
FULL TEXT  

The doctrine of early intervention
Sweeney et al.
BMJ 1996;313:1097-1097.
FULL TEXT  

Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial
Grunfeld et al.
BMJ 1996;313:665-669.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

COST OF PATIENT FOLLOW-UP AFTER POTENTIALLY CURATIVE LUNG CANCER TREATMENT
Virgo et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996;112:356-363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Questions about the Value of Early Intervention
Welch
NEJM 1996;334:1472-1473.
FULL TEXT  

The ``Cured'' Lung Cancer Patient: Is Follow-up by the Surgeon Worthwhile?
Hiebert
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995;60:1557-1558.
FULL TEXT  

Is Follow-up of Lung Cancer Patients After Resection Medically Indicated and Cost-Effective?
Walsh et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995;60:1563-1570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Follow up in breast cancer
Dewar
BMJ 1995;310:685-686.
FULL TEXT  

DETECTING EARLY BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE: DOES IT HELP?
JWatch General 1994;1994:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.