You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 21, June 1, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Ethics

E. D. Pellegrino
Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

A first ethical question is whether the assumptions underlying managed care and competition are sound enough to justify the moral risks attendant on dividing the physician's loyalties. Physicians have been immune from liability if they respond to cost-containment directives in the same way as their colleagues.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Professionalism in Pediatrics
Fallat et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e1123-e1133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Our Endangered Integrity -- It Can Only Get Worse
Kassirer
NEJM 1997;336:1666-1667.
FULL TEXT  

Agreement on Disease-Specific Criteria for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Acute Stroke
Alexandrov et al.
Stroke 1996;27:232-237.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.