This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Swedish Survey

Margareta Sanner, DMSc

JAMA. 1994;271(4):284-288.

Abstract
Objective.
—To evaluate people's reactions to procedures involving the dead body by comparing their attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and dissection.

Design.
—Survey, using a questionnaire with 24 items that address reactions toward autopsy, organ donation, and donation of the whole body, including religious and sociodemographic issues.

Participants.
—An age-stratified, random sample of 1950 individuals in Sweden, 18 to 75 years old. The response rate was 65%.

Results.
—Eighty-four percent reported acceptance of an autopsy for themselves and 80% for a close relative. Sixty-two percent were willing to donate their own organs and 39% to donate the organs of a family member; 15% accepted donation of their whole body for dissection. Practically all who accepted dissection also were willing to donate their organs and to be autopsied; practically all who were willing to donate their organs also accepted autopsy. About 65% to 70% felt some discomfort at the thought of autopsy and organ donation. Women seemed more sensitive toward operations on the dead body than men.

Conclusions.
—The rank order of medical procedures after death, based on the proportion of individuals positive toward the procedures, can be used to form a scale with autopsy and dissection at each end point and organ donation in the middle. This scale has the characteristics of a Guttman scale and can be looked on as a comfort-discomfort continuum regarding procedures involving the dead body.

(JAMA. 1994;271:284-288)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Social Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Social Medicine, Akademiska sjukhuset, 751 85 Uppsala, S-Sweden (Dr Sanner).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

To see for myself: informed consent and the culture of openness
Walter
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:675-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Facts versus `Feelings': How Rational Is the Decision to Become an Organ Donor?
Morgan et al.
J Health Psychol 2008;13:644-658.
ABSTRACT  

Living Cadavers and the Calculation of Death
Lock
Body Society 2004;10:135-152.
ABSTRACT  

Paying Our Last Respects: The Neonatal Autopsy as Continuing Care and Ethical Obligation
Battaglia
NeoReviews 2003;4:e207-211.
FULL TEXT  

Brain death
Elliot
Trauma 2003;5:23-42.
ABSTRACT  

Human Body Parts as Therapeutic Tools: Contradictory Discourses and Transformed Subjectivities
Lock
Qual Health Res 2002;12:1406-1418.
 

Family members' experiences of autopsy
Oppewal and Meyboom-De Jong
Fam Pract 2001;18:304-308.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Autopsy Consent Practice at US Teaching Hospitals: Results of a National Survey
Rosenbaum et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:374-380.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obtaining consent for autopsy in dementia research: The Memory and Aging Project experience
Norton and Morris
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 1996;11:2-6.
ABSTRACT  

Public Attitudes Toward Autopsy, Organ Donation, and Dissection
Balic and Rumboldt
JAMA 1995;273:1907-1907.
ABSTRACT  

Attitudes Toward Autopsy and Organ Donation in Sweden and the United States
Lundberg
JAMA 1994;271:317-317.
ABSTRACT