You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 9, March 2, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxic Effects of Sustained- vs Immediate-Release Niacin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients

James M. McKenney, PharmD; Jack D. Proctor, MD; Scott Harris, PharmD; Vernon M. Chinchili, PhD

JAMA. 1994;271(9):672-677.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare escalating doses of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) niacin for effectiveness in reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides and increasing levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and for the occurrence of adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity.

Design.
—Randomized, double-blind, parallel comparison of IR and SR niacin administered sequentially at 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000 mg/d, each for 6 weeks.

Setting.
—Cholesterol research center.

Patients.
—Forty-six adults, 23 in each group, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) after 1 month of a step 1 National Cholesterol Education Program diet.

Outcome Measures.
—Fourteen-hour fasting lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels, results of clinical laboratory tests, a symptom questionnaire, and withdrawal rates.

Results.
—The SR niacin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than IR niacin did at the dosage of 1500 mg/d and above, while IR niacin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than SR niacin did at all dosage levels. The reduction in triglyceride levels was similar with IR and SR niacin. Nine (39%) of the 23 patients assigned to the IR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were vasodilatory symptoms, fatigue, and acanthosis nigricans. Eighteen (78%) of the 23 patients assigned to the SR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were gastrointestinal tract symptoms, fatigue, and increases in levels of liver aminotransferases, often with symptoms of hepatic dysfunction. None of the patients taking IR niacin developed hepatoxic effects, while 12 (52%) of the 23 patients taking SR niacin did.

Conclusion.
—The SR form of niacin is hepatotoxic and should be restricted from use. The IR niacin is preferred for the management of hypercholesterolemia but can also cause significant adverse effects and should be given only to patients who can be carefully monitored by experienced health professionals.

(JAMA. 1994;271:672-677)



Author Affiliations

From the Schools of Pharmacy (Dr McKenney) and Medicine (Dr Proctor), Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Baptist Medical Center, Little Rock, Ark (Dr Harris); and College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey (Dr Chinchili).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to PO Box 533, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298 (Dr McKenney).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Metabolic Syndrome
Cornier et al.
Endocr. Rev. 2008;29:777-822.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Investigation and management of hypertriglyceridaemia
Ferns et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:1174-1183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nicotinic Acid Receptor Agonists Differentially Activate Downstream Effectors
Richman et al.
J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:18028-18036.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antilipolytic Activity of a Novel Partial A1 Adenosine Receptor Agonist Devoid of Cardiovascular Effects: Comparison with Nicotinic Acid
Dhalla et al.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007;321:327-333.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Niaspan(R): creating a new concept for raising HDL-cholesterol
McGovern
Eur Heart J Suppl 2005;7:F41-F47.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Raising HDL-C and lowering triglycerides: benefits beyond LDL-C modification
Shepherd
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 2005;5:S12-S16.
ABSTRACT  

Modern intervention strategies for managing dyslipidaemia: the case for combination therapy
Drexel
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 2005;5:S17-S23.
ABSTRACT  

Addressing Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Focus on Dyslipidemia
Meagher
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:424-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Perspectives on the Use of Niacin in the Treatment of Lipid Disorders
McKenney
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:697-705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Metabolic Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Clinical Relevance, and Use of Niacin
Ito
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:277-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Varying Cost and Free Nicotinic Acid Content in Over-the-Counter Niacin Preparations for Dyslipidemia
Meyers et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:996-1002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Management of Hyperlipidemia/Dyslipidemia
Kreisberg and Oberman
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;88:2445-2461.
FULL TEXT  

Niacin as a Component of Combination Therapy for Dyslipidemia
Miller
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:735-742.
ABSTRACT  

Niacin-ER and Lovastatin Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia
Yim and Chong
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:106-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

References
Circulation 2002;106:3373-3421.
FULL TEXT  

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Once-Daily Niacin for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia Associated With Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Assessment of Diabetes Control and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Niaspan Trial
Grundy et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1568-1576.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Niacin, but Not Gemfibrozil, Selectively Increases LP-AI, a Cardioprotective Subfraction of HDL, in Patients With Low HDL Cholesterol
Sakai et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2001;21:1783-1789.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extended-Release Niacin vs Gemfibrozil for the Treatment of Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Guyton et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1177-1184.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug Treatment of Lipid Disorders
Knopp
NEJM 1999;341:498-511.
FULL TEXT  

New Perspectives on the Management of Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Harper and Jacobson
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1049-1057.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Forecasting Patient Outcomes in the Management of Hyperlipidemia
Brier et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:569-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Trial of Wax-Matrix Sustained-Release Niacin in a Russian Population With Hypercholesterolemia
Aronov et al.
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:567-575.
ABSTRACT  

Efficacy and Safety of a New HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, Atorvastatin, in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia
Bakker-Arkema et al.
JAMA 1996;275:128-133.
ABSTRACT  

Safety and Side Effects of Sustained-Release Niacin
Keenan et al.
JAMA 1994;272:513-513.
ABSTRACT  

Safety and Side Effects of Sustained-Release Niacin
Weiner
JAMA 1994;272:514-514.
ABSTRACT  

Safety and Side Effects of Sustained-Release Niacin
Lavie and Milani
JAMA 1994;272:513-514.
ABSTRACT  

Safety and Side Effects of Sustained-Release Niacin
Shields and Beckmann
JAMA 1994;272:514-514.
ABSTRACT  

HEPATOTOXICITY OF SUSTAINED-RELEASE NIACIN
JWatch General 1994;1994:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Over-the-Counter Niacin
Lasagna
JAMA 1994;271:709-710.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.