 |
|
Use of Cell Culture and a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis Screening
Edward W. Hook III, MD;
Christopher Spitters, MD, MPH;
Cindy A. Reichart, MT(ASCP);
Theresa M. Neumann;
Thomas C. Quinn, MD
JAMA. 1994;272(11):867-870.
Abstract
| |
Objectives.
—To compare a rapid, office-based test with standard cell culture for screening of women for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Design and Settings.
—An 8-month prospective crossover trial used alternating screening protocols in two Baltimore (Md) sexually transmitted disease clinics from January 2 through August 14, 1991.
Participants.
—Consecutive women attending the two clinics who had no indication for administration of antichlamydial antibiotic therapy (eg, history of recent sexual contact with a partner with a sexually transmitted disease, mucopurulent cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, known gonorrhea, or previously diagnosed Chlamydia infections).
Interventions.
—Chlamydia screening was offered according to one of two protocols. Use of the two screening protocols was alternated between clinics each month. In the "rapid test clinic," eligible women were screened with both a 30-minute enzyme immunoassay test and tissue culture. Patients screened with the rapid test were asked to remain in the clinic until their rapid assay results were available so that, if positive, the patients could be treated. In the "routine screening clinic," eligible women were screened for Chlamydia by cell culture. Women identified as being infected with Chlamydia by screening culture were later confidentially notified of their test results by health department disease intervention specialists and referred for therapy.
Main Outcome Measures.
—Performance of screening tests for bringing infected patients to therapy; time intervals between initial clinic visits and therapy; and pelvic inflammatory disease occurring between initial visits and therapy.
Results.
—Chlamydia cultures were positive in 100 (6.6%) of 1526 women screened with the solid-phase immunoassay, 47 of which were detected and treated on the basis of rapid test results. In contrast, 93 (74%) of 126 women with positive screening cultures returned to the clinic and received therapy. The median interval between testing and therapy for women with positive screening cultures was 14 days, and three (3.2%) developed pelvic inflammatory disease in the interval between testing and return for therapy.
Conclusions.
—Neither cell culture nor a rapid diagnostic test performed well for ensuring therapy of women with Chlamydia infections. The sensitivity of the rapid diagnostic test was low, and nearly one fourth of the women with positive screening cultures did not return for therapy. Evaluation of screening for Chlamydia should consider the utility of strategies for bringing patients to treatment, as well as the more usual measures of test performance, such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
(JAMA. 1994;272:867-870)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Dr Hook); Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Baltimore (Md) City Health Department (Drs Hook and Spitters); Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (Drs Hook and Quinn and Mss Reichart and Neumann); Department of Preventive Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore (Dr Spitters); and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Quinn). Drs Hook and Quinn have received honoraria as speakers for Abbott Laboratories, the manufacturer of the rapid diagnostic assay used in this study.
Footnotes
Reprint requests to University of Alabama at Birmingham, 229 THT, 1900 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0006 (Dr Hook).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test bridging the gap between diagnosis and treatment: performance evaluation study
Mahilum-Tapay et al.
BMJ 2007;335:1190-1194.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Modelling the cost effectiveness of rapid point of care diagnostic tests for the control of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers.
Vickerman et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2006;82:403-412.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Identification of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among women in rural Haiti: maximising access to treatment in a resource poor setting.
Smith Fawzi et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2006;82:175-181.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Decision Analysis: Point-of-care Chlamydia Testing vs. Laboratory-based Methods
Swain et al.
Clin Med Res 2004;2:29-35.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sensitivity requirements for the point of care diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women
Vickerman et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2003;79:363-367.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of a Rapid Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Outpatient Clinics in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
Widjaja et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:4183-4185.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Reference Standard Sensitivity on Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Assays and a Leukocyte Esterase Dipstick for Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in First-Void Urine Specimens from Men
Chernesky et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:2777-2780.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA Assay with Specimens from Women Attending a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic
Pate et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36:2183-2186.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Urine-Based Screening of Adolescents in Detention to Guide Treatment for Gonococcal and Chlamydial Infections: Translating Research Into Intervention
Oh et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:52-56.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Screening and Treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Women
Genc and Mardh
ANN INTERN MED 1996;124:1-7.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis Screening
Ferris et al.
JAMA 1995;273:917-918.
ABSTRACT
RAPID CHLAMYDIA SCREENING YIELDS DISAPPOINTING RESULTS
JWatch General 1994;1994:2-2.
FULL TEXT
|
