You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 272 No. 16, October 26, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sex and Gender Bias in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Text Illustrations

Kathleen D. Mendelsohn; Linda Z. Nieman, PhD; Krista Isaacs; Sophia Lee; Sandra P. Levison, MD

JAMA. 1994;272(16):1267-1270.


Abstract

Objective.
—To examine the sex and gender distribution of illustrations in two atlases, five anatomy texts, and five physical diagnosis texts.

Design.
—Of 4060 illustrations that were identifiable by sex and gender in 12 commonly used anatomy and physical diagnosis textbooks, 3827 were categorized by two reviewers as female, male, or neutral.

Results.
—Females were represented, on average, in 21.2% of the anatomy text illustrations; males were represented, on average, in 44.3%; 34.4% of the illustrations were neutral. Of the nonreproductive anatomy illustrations, a mean of 11.1% (range, 4.6% to 23.8%) depicted women and 43.1% (range, 35.4% to 56.2%) depicted men. Of nonreproductive anatomy illustrations, a mean of 45.8% (range, 27.2% to 59.9%) were neutral. Overall, the physical diagnosis text illustrations demonstrated a more equal sex and gender distribution (21.5% female and 24.8% male). However, in the reproductive chapters of the physical diagnosis texts, females were depicted in a mean of 71.1% (range, 63.2% to 79.0%) of the illustrations, while in the nonreproductive chapters, females were depicted in 8.8% of total illustrations.

Conclusions.
—In anatomy and physical diagnosis texts, women are underrepresented in illustrations of nonreproductive anatomy. The finding that males are depicted in a majority of nonreproductive anatomy illustrations may perpetuate the image of the male body as the normal or standard model for medical education.

(JAMA. 1994;272:1267-1270)



Author Affiliations

From the Office of Medical Education (Dr Nieman) and Department of Medicine (Dr Levison), Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Ms Mendelsohn is a medical student at the Medical College of Pennsylvania, and Mss Isaacs and Lee are students at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Women's Health Education Program, Medical College of Pennsylvania, 3300 Henry Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19129 (Dr Levison).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Women and Teaching in Academic Psychiatry
Hirshbein et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2004;28:292-298.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Traffic in Cyberanatomies: Sex/Gender/Sexualities in Local and Global Formations
MOORE and CLARKE
Body Society 2001;7:57-96.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Arja
JAMA 1995;273:1255-1255.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Passaretti
JAMA 1995;273:1256-1256.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Wright
JAMA 1995;273:1255-1255.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Zahniser
JAMA 1995;273:1255-1255.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Denman
JAMA 1995;273:1255-1256.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Brunemeier
JAMA 1995;273:1256-1256.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Hubel
JAMA 1995;273:1256-1256.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Willms and Schneiderman
JAMA 1995;273:1256-1257.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Gale
JAMA 1995;273:1257-1257.
ABSTRACT  

Sex and Gender Bias in Illustrations in Anatomy and Physical Diagnosis Texts
Yeakel
JAMA 1995;273:1257-1257.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.