You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 272 No. 23, December 21, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Cost-effectiveness of Voluntary Counseling and Testing of Hospital Inpatients for HIV Infection

Peter Lurie, MD, MPH; Andrew L. Avins, MD, MPH; Kathryn A. Phillips, PhD, MPA; James G. Kahn, MD, MPH; Robert A. Lowe, MD, MPH; Daniel Ciccarone, MD

JAMA. 1994;272(23):1832-1838.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of voluntary counseling and testing of US hospital inpatients for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Data Sources.
—Data for entry into the model were derived from a review of the literature, consultation with experts, and consensus of the authors.

Data Extraction.
—We rated our confidence in these probabilities and costs by grading the data inputs using methods adapted from those of the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Data Synthesis.
—Decision analysis models were developed to evaluate two outcomes: (1) cost per health care worker (HCW) HIV infection averted if measures are taken by the HCW to reduce his or her risk of acquiring HIV; and (2) cost per inpatient HIV infection detected. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Using baseline input values, testing to avert HCW infection may prevent 3.6 HIV infections per year at a total program cost of $2.7 billion, or a cost of $753 million per infection averted. At baseline assumptions (seroprevalence=1%), testing to detect inpatient HIV infection would cost $16 104 per year per infection detected. Cost-effectiveness at baseline drops to $8353 per HIV infection detected if the seroprevalence is 10%. If testing is limited to hospitals with inpatient seroprevalences of at least 1%, approximately 5400 persons per year will be falsely labeled HIV-positive.

Conclusions.
—This analysis provides no justification for testing inpatients to prevent HIV infection of HCWs. Screening inpatients to detect HIV infection may be justified at seroprevalences exceeding 1%, but issues of medical or social discrimination, false-positive results, informed consent, and logistics must be resolved first.

(JAMA. 1994;272:1832-1838)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (Drs Lurie, Avins, Phillips, Kahn, and Lowe), Institute for Health Policy Studies (Drs Lurie, Phillips, and Kahn), Departments of Family and Community Medicine (Dr Lurie) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Lurie, Avins, and Kahn), and Division of General Internal Medicine (Dr Phillips), University of California—San Francisco; Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital (Dr Avins); and the Student Health Center, University of California—Berkeley (Dr Ciccarone). Dr Avins is now with the Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco. Dr Lowe is now with the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Given as an oral presentation at the Ninth International Conference on AIDS, Berlin, Germany, June 8, 1993.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses in HIV/AIDS: Implications for Public Policy
Hornberger et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:789-821.
ABSTRACT  

One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluations
Barham et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2007;83:441-446.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for HIV in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
Sanders et al.
NEJM 2005;352:570-585.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying Undiagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus: The Yield of Routine, Voluntary Inpatient Testing
Walensky et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:887-892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Testing: Accounting for Differential Participation Rates
Paltiel and Kaplan
Med Decis Making 1997;17:490-495.
ABSTRACT  

Economic Impact of Treatment of HIV-Positive Pregnant Women and Their Newborns With Zidovudine: Implications for HIV Screening
Mauskopf et al.
JAMA 1996;276:132-138.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effectiveness of HIV Screening in Acute Care Settings
Owens et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:394-404.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of Voluntary Counseling and Testina of Hospital Patients for HIV
Mundy and Quinn
JAMA 1995;274:129-129.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of Voluntary Counseling and Testina of Hospital Patients for HIV
Weber et al.
JAMA 1995;274:129-130.
ABSTRACT  

INPATIENT HIV SCREENING ISN'T COST-EFFECTIVE
JWatch General 1994;1994:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.