You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 14, April 12, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Cancer screening behaviors and attitudes of women in southeastern Minnesota

T. E. Kottke, M. A. Trapp, M. M. Fores, A. W. Kelly, S. H. Jung, P. J. Novotny and L. A. Panser
National Cancer Institute-Designated Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

OBJECTIVES--To determine the rates at which women received screening Papanicolaou tests, clinical breast examinations, and mammography and to determine the extent to which these women might be expected to respond to screening recommendations from their physicians. DESIGN--Random-digit-dial telephone interviews conducted in January 1993. SETTING--Fifteen counties in southeastern Minnesota. SUBJECTS--A sample of 1019 women who completed the telephone interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Self-reported Papanicolaou test, clinical breast examination, and mammography screening rates, with verification from medical records for a randomly selected subsample of 200 respondents who reported having had a test within 1 year of the interview. RESULTS--For women aged 18 years and older, 60% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.4%) reported having had a Papanicolaou test within the preceding year. For women 40 years of age and older, 57% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.5%) reported having had a clinical breast examination in the past year, and 46% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.6%) reported having had a screening mammogram within 1 year. The verified 1-year Papanicolaou test and mammogram rates were 35% and 33%, respectively. More than 90% of the respondents expressed a willingness to have these tests if their physicians were to advise them that the tests were indicated. However, 53% and 54% of the respondents, respectively, said that they either did not care or did not want their physicians to remind them when they were due for a Papanicolaou test or a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS--Although self-reported screening rates in this population meet Healthy People 2000 goals, verified rates were significantly below target levels. A substantial proportion of women in this population remain ambivalent about participating in cancer detection programs.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accuracy of Self-Reported Cancer-Screening Histories: A Meta-analysis
Rauscher et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:748-757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of Health Status, Age, and Race on Screening Mammography in Elderly Women
Bynum et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2083-2088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Factors Associated with the Use of Breast Cancer Screening by Women Age 60 Years or Over
Michielutte et al.
Health Educ Behav 1999;26:625-647.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.