Evaluation of a rapid bedside assay for detection of serum cardiac troponin T

E. M. Antman, C. Grudzien and D. B. Sacks
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate a rapid, qualitative, bedside immunoassay for cardiac-specific troponin T (cTnT) using a handheld device containing monoclonal antibodies. DESIGN--Comparison of rapid cTnT assay with clinical standard for diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). SETTING--Tertiary care university medical center. PATIENTS--A cohort of 100 patients admitted for evaluation of chest pain who had sufficient blood samples at presentation for measurement of creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB fraction, and rapid cTnT as well as adequate clinical data to establish the diagnosis of MI. INTERVENTION--None; treating physicians were blinded to rapid cTnT results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sensitivity and specificity of rapid cTnT assay for MI; likelihood ratios of positive and negative rapid cTnT assay results; relative risk (RR) for serious cardiac events with positive rapid cTnT assay result on admission. RESULTS--Sensitivity of the rapid cTnT assay increased from 33% within 2 hours from the onset of chest pain to 86% after 8 hours (P < .001); specificity ranged from 86% to 100% during the same time intervals. The odds of an MI increased sixfold with a positive assay result within 2 hours of chest pain and decreased sixfold with a negative assay result after 8 hours. The RR for experiencing death or nonfatal MI was 6.8 for patients presenting with a positive rapid cTnT assay. CONCLUSIONS--The rapid cTnT assay is a simple, efficient test that for the first time provides clinicians with a useful laboratory tool for point-of-care evaluation of patients with chest pain.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical research of kidney diseases II: problems of study design
Ravani et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2785-2794.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-1660.
FULL TEXT  

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS et al.
Circulation 2007;115:e356-e375.
FULL TEXT  

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS et al.
Clin. Chem. 2007;53:552-574.
FULL TEXT  

Ninety-Minute Exclusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction By Use of Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing of Myoglobin and Troponin I
McCord et al.
Circulation 2001;104:1483-1488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of an Albumin Cobalt Binding Test for Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Multicenter Study
Christenson et al.
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:464-470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biochemical markers in the management of suspected acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department
Huggon et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2001;18:15-19.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification in unstable angina: the role of clinical prediction models
Katz
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1809-1811.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiovascular risk and therapeutic benefit of coronary interventions for patients with unstable angina according to the troponin T status
Heeschen et al.
Eur Heart J 2000;21:1159-1166.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of the Patient with Acute Chest Pain
Lee and Goldman
NEJM 2000;342:1187-1195.
FULL TEXT  

Acute coronary ischemia: troponin I and T
Sacks
Vasc Med 1999;4:253-256.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with anginal pain and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms
Mathew et al.
QJM 1999;92:565-571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification of emergency department patients with acute coronary syndromes using P-Selectin
Hollander et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:95-105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: Recommendations for the Use of Cardiac Markers in Coronary Artery Diseases
Wu et al.
Clin. Chem. 1999;45:1104-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Cardiac Troponin I in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain
Kontos et al.
Circulation 1999;99:2073-2078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Laboratory-Clinical Interface: Point-of-Care Testing
Kost et al.
Chest 1999;115:1140-1154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should the Electrocardiogram Be Used to Guide Therapy for Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block and Suspected Myocardial Infarction?
Shlipak et al.
JAMA 1999;281:714-719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Troponins
Coudrey
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1173-1180.
FULL TEXT  

Emergency Room Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain by Means of Rapid Testing for Cardiac Troponin T or Troponin I
Hamm et al.
NEJM 1997;337:1648-1653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac Troponins T and I Before and After Renal Transplantation
Wu et al.
Clin. Chem. 1997;43:411a-412.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiac Troponin T Levels for Risk Stratification in Acute Myocardial Ischemia
Ohman et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1333-1342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Significance of Admission Troponin T Concentrations in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
Stubbs et al.
Circulation 1996;94:1291-1297.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT