You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 17, May 3, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predictors of Successful Prompted Voiding Among Incontinent Nursing Home Residents

Joseph G. Ouslander, MD; John F. Schnelle, PhD; Gwen Uman, PhD, GNP; Susan Fingold; Jennifer Glater Nigam, MN; Edward Tuico; Barbara Bates-Jensen, MN

JAMA. 1995;273(17):1366-1370.


Abstract

Objective.
—To develop a simple, noninvasive assessment strategy that will enable nursing home staff to identify incontinent residents who respond well to prompted voiding.

Design.
—Incontinent nursing home residents underwent an extensive clinical and functional assessment and then 7 days of prompted voiding. Data from the assessment and the first 3 days of prompted voiding were used to predict responsiveness to the intervention.

Setting.
—Seven nursing homes.

Patients.
—A cohort of 191 incontinent, long-stay nursing home residents who passed a simple behavioral screen (able to state their name or reliably point to one of two named objects).

Intervention.
—Prompted voiding was carried out by trained research nurse's aides from 7 AM to 7 PM for 7 days. The intervention was maintained in responsive residents 5 days per week for an additional 9 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Physical checks for wetness were done by research staff hourly from 7 AM to 7 PM for 3 days in a baseline condition, during days 5 through 7 of the 7-day prompted voiding intervention, and for 3 days at the end of 9 weeks of prompted voiding in the responsive group. Outcome measures were percentage of checks wet and response to prompted voiding, with "responders" defined as residents with an average of one or fewer wet episode per day on days 5 through 7 of prompted voiding.

Results.
—Seventy-eight (41%) of the residents were responders. Their wet percentage went from 26.7% to 6.4% at the end of 1 week and was maintained at 9.6% after 9 weeks of prompted voiding. The best predictors of responsiveness were the wet percentage and the appropriate toileting percentage during the first 3 days of prompted voiding, the self-care subscale score of the Multidimensional Observational Scale for the Elderly, and the ability to ambulate without human assistance. The best sensitivity and specificity in identifying responders was achieved when either the wet percentage was lower than 20% or the appropriate toileting percentage was higher than 66% during the first 3 days of prompted voiding (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 69%). Those residents falsely identified as responders by these criteria still had a 46% relative reduction in wetness.

Conclusions.
—A substantial proportion of nursing home residents respond well to prompted voiding. The most responsive residents can be easily identified using data collected during a 3-day trial of the intervention. The assessment strategy is consistent with federal guidelines and could be used to facilitate quality control by assessing changes in percentage of wetness from the expected norm.

(JAMA. 1995;273:1366-1370)



Author Affiliations

From the UCLA Borun Center for Gerontological Research (Drs Ouslander, Schnelle, and Uman, Mss Fingold, Nigam, and Bates-Jensen, and Mr Tuico), the UCLA Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (Drs Ouslander and Schnelle), and the Jewish Home for the Aging (Drs Ouslander and Schnelle), Los Angeles, Calif.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Jewish Home for the Aging, 18855 Victory Blvd, Reseda, CA 91335 (Dr Ouslander).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Distance Learning: A Strategy for Improving Incontinence Care in Nursing Homes
Rahman et al.
The Gerontologist 2009;0:gnp126v1-gnp126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Restoring continence in frail older people living in the community: what factors influence successful treatment outcomes?
Harari and Igbedioh
Age Ageing 2009;38:228-233.
FULL TEXT  

Individualized Feeding Assistance Care for Nursing Home Residents: Staffing Requirements to Implement Two Interventions
Simmons and Schnelle
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2004;59:M966-M973.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Overactive Bladder
Ouslander
NEJM 2004;350:786-799.
FULL TEXT  

Statewide Strategy to Improve Quality of Care in Nursing Facilities
Rantz et al.
Gerontologist 2003;43:248-258.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders: ACOVE Project Overview
Wenger et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:642-646.
FULL TEXT  

Randomized Clinical Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention in Nursing Homes
Rantz et al.
Gerontologist 2001;41:525-538.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An 89-Year-Old Woman With Urinary Incontinence
Resnick
JAMA 1996;276:1832-1840.
ABSTRACT  

The Science of the Art of Geriatric Medicine
Hadley
JAMA 1995;273:1381-1383.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.