This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (58)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert L. Kane, MD

JAMA. 1995;273(17):1376-1380.

Abstract
Quality of long-term care can be improved by changing the strategies used to monitor it. Nursing home care has been the subject of intensive regulations, while it has been neglected by physicians. Newer forms of long-term care are coming under stricter oversight, which may stifle the innovations they offer. Greater but different attention is needed: more creativity can be fostered with better accountability by emphasizing long-term care outcomes. It is unrealistic to require that long-term care patients will improve; good outcomes are defined as doing as well as or better than expected. The Minimum Data Set for nursing homes offers a mechanism to generate data on many pertinent outcomes. An outcomes focus would encourage more collective action by the various parties involved in providing long-term care, including physicians. Clinicians are reluctant to assume responsibility for outcomes they feel unable to strongly influence, but they must recognize that part of their role is to engender cooperation from the myriad participants in long-term care, including patients and their families. Better-quality long-term care may cost more, but it may be possible to use less expensive personnel more creatively if current regulations are modified. Managed care arrangements offer one vehicle for reorganizing care and could provide the appropriate incentives to make positive changes. However, they could also lead to minimalist strategies. Accountability for realistic outcomes can provide the needed countervailing regulatory pressure.

(JAMA. 1995;273:1376-1380)

Author Affiliations
From the Minnesota Chair in Long-Term Care and Aging, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

Footnotes
Presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Association for Health Services Research, June 12, 1994, San Diego, Calif.

Reprint requests to the Minnesota Chair in Long-Term Care and Aging, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Box 197, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr Kane).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Nursing Home Consumer Complaints and Quality of Care: A National View
Stevenson
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:347-368.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Resident Outcomes With GAPN Organization Level Interventions
Krichbaum et al.
West J Nurs Res 2005;27:322-337.
ABSTRACT  

"At least Mom will be safe there": the role of resident safety in nursing home quality
Kapp
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:201-204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review
Wagner et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:211-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Nursing Home
Berlowitz et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2001;16:189-195.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Outcomes: An Application in VA Long term Care
Rosen et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2001;16:118-127.
ABSTRACT  

Randomized Clinical Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention in Nursing Homes
Rantz et al.
Gerontologist 2001;41:525-538.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Value-Added Outcomes: The Use of Advanced Practice Nurses in Long-Term Care Facilities
Ryden et al.
Gerontologist 2000;40:654-662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Discharge Outcomes of VA Nursing Home Residents
Mehr et al.
J Aging Health 1997;9:244-265.
ABSTRACT  

Variations in Outcomes of Care in Urban and Rural Nursing Facilities in Maine
Coburn et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 1996;15:202-223.
ABSTRACT  

The 'Nursing' in Nursing Homes
Manning
JAMA 1995;274:1268-1268.
ABSTRACT