You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 2, January 11, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Risk stratification in unstable angina. Prospective validation of the Braunwald classification

J. E. Calvin, L. W. Klein, B. J. VandenBerg, P. Meyer, J. V. Condon, R. J. Snell, L. M. Ramirez-Morgen and J. E. Parrillo
Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill. 60612.

OBJECTIVES. To validate the Braunwald classification of unstable angina as a predictor of in-hospital cardiac complications; to determine which factors of the Braunwald classification contributed significantly to this prediction; and to devise a method of combining these predictive factors into an overall odds ratio for complications. DESIGN. A validation cohort of consecutive patients followed prospectively for in-hospital cardiac complications including myocardial infarction and death. SETTING. A community-based academic medical center. PATIENTS. A total of 393 patients admitted consecutively to the coronary care and intermediate care units with unstable angina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Major cardiac complications including death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and severe ventricular dysrhythmias. RESULTS. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified four clinical factors used in the Braunwald classification that predicted the in-hospital occurrence of major cardiac complications: (1) myocardial infarction within less than 14 days (odds ratio [OR], 5.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92 to 16.97); (2) need for intravenous nitroglycerin (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.31 to 4.17); (3) lack of beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker prior to admission (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.55 to 9.42); and (4) baseline ST depression (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.45 to 5.47). Two other clinical factors, diabetes and age, were also significant predictors. Validation of this model using parametric and nonparametric bootstrap techniques revealed excellent agreement between the CIs for adjusted ORs derived from the multiple logistic regression and those derived from the bootstrap. CONCLUSIONS. The classification of unstable angina proposed by Braunwald includes four factors that predict risk of major in-hospital cardiac complications. Specific factors used in this classification can be combined with diabetes and age to better stratify risk of major cardiac complications in this disorder using a simpler model.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better
Yan et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1072-1078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

FRISC score for selection of patients for an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease
Lagerqvist et al.
Heart 2005;91:1047-1052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of medical practice guidelines on the assessment of patients with acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation
Wasserfallen et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:383-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Sabatine and Antman
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:89S-95S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of a Clinical Decision Rule on Hospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department
Reilly et al.
JAMA 2002;288:342-350.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does eptifibatide confer a greater benefit to patients with unstable angina than with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction?. Insights from the PURSUIT Trial
Chang et al.
Eur Heart J 2002;23:1102-1111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should we catheterize all patients with unstable angina? No--only the ones with coronary artery disease
Kussmaul
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:977-978.
FULL TEXT  

Multivessel coronary artery disease: current revascularization strategies
Patil et al.
Eur Heart J 2001;22:1183-1197.
 

Prognostic value of ST segment depression in acute coronary syndromes: insights from PARAGON-A applied to GUSTO-IIb
Kaul et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:64-71.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Unstable Angina Response
Agostoni et al.
Circulation 2000;102 :e177-e177.
FULL TEXT  

Validated risk stratification model accurately predicts low risk in patients with unstable angina
Calvin et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1803-1808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification in unstable angina: the role of clinical prediction models
Katz
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1809-1811.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK)
Collinson et al.
Eur Heart J 2000;21:1450-1457.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of Diabetes on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Unstable Angina and Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction : Results of the OASIS (Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes) Registry
Malmberg et al.
Circulation 2000;102:1014-1019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non-ST Elevation MI: A Method for Prognostication and Therapeutic Decision Making
Antman et al.
JAMA 2000;284:835-842.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Classification of Unstable Angina Revisited
Hamm and Braunwald
Circulation 2000;102:118-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unstable Angina: Current Concepts of Pathogenesis and Treatment
Ambrose and Dangas
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:25-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment
Iliadis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1689-1695.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utility of cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MBmass, myosin light chain 1, and myoglobin in the early in-hospital triage of "high risk" patients with chest pain
Hillis et al.
Heart 1999;82:614-620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Scanlon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
FULL TEXT  

Unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: does the clinical diagnosis have therapeutic implications?
Zaacks et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:107-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Value of Serial Troponin T Measures for Early and Late Risk Stratification in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Newby et al.
Circulation 1998;98:1853-1859.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Coronary Syndromes : Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction
Theroux and Fuster
Circulation 1998;97:1195-1206.
FULL TEXT  

Predictive Validity of the Braunwald Classification of Unstable Angina for Angiographic Findings, Short-Term Prognoses, and Treatment Selection
Owa et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1997;48:663-671.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiac Troponin T Levels for Risk Stratification in Acute Myocardial Ischemia
Ohman et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1333-1342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.