Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis

K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, S. M. Rubin, C. Sandrock and V. L. Ernster
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

OBJECTIVE. To determine the efficacy of screening mammography by age, number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, and duration of follow-up. DESIGN. Literature review and meta-analysis. DATA IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS. Literature search of English-language studies reported from January 1966 to October 31, 1993, using MEDLINE, manual literature review, and consultation with experts. A total of 13 studies were selected, and their results were combined using meta-analytic techniques based on the assumption of fixed effects. MAIN RESULTS. The overall summary relative risk (RR) estimate for breast cancer mortality for women aged 50 to 74 years undergoing screening mammography compared with those who did not was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.83). The magnitude of the benefit in this age group was similar regardless of number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, or duration of follow-up. In contrast, none of the summary RR estimates for women aged 40 to 49 years was significantly less than 1.0, irrespective of screening intervention or duration of follow-up. The overall summary RR estimate in women aged 40 to 49 years was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13); the summary RR estimate for those studies that used two-view mammography was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12) compared with 1.02 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.44) for those studies that used one-view mammography, and for those studies with 7 to 9 years of follow-up, the summary RR estimate was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.27) compared with 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.06) for those studies with 10 to 12 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION. Screening mammography significantly reduces breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 to 74 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up, regardless of screening interval or number of mammographic views per screen. There is no reduction in breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up. Screening mammography may be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 10 to 12 years of follow-up, but the same benefit could probably be achieved by beginning screening at menopause or 50 years of age.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Molecular Breast Imaging: Use of a Dual-Head Dedicated Gamma Camera to Detect Small Breast Tumors
Hruska et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:1805-1815.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tamoxifen Chemoprevention Treatment and Time to First Diagnosis of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
Shen et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1448-1453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Mammography in Older Women: Effect of Wealth and Prognosis
Williams et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:514-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans
Vernon et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:347-358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supermedia Interface for Internet-based Telediagnostics of Breast Pathology
Shen et al.
The International Journal of Robotics Research 2007;26:1235-1250.
ABSTRACT  

Accuracy of Diagnostic Procedures: Has It Improved Over the Past Five Decades?
Berlin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;188:1173-1178.
FULL TEXT  

Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Female Breast Cancer: Screening Rates and Stage at Diagnosis
Sassi et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:2165-2172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stem cell aging and cancer.
Fuller
Sci Aging Knowl Environ 2006;2006:pe12-pe12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Health Journalists Bridge the State-of-the-Science Gap in Mammography Guidelines?
Chew et al.
Science Communication 2006;27:331-351.
ABSTRACT  

Lung Cancer Screening: Radiology's Opportunity Here and Now
Gur
Radiology 2006;238:395-397.
FULL TEXT  

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Breast Cancer Among American Indian Women From the Northern Plains
Wampler et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 2006;25:44S-59S.
ABSTRACT  

Breast Cancer Trends Among Black and White Women in the United States
Jatoi et al.
JCO 2005;23:7836-7841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of Health Status, Age, and Race on Screening Mammography in Elderly Women
Bynum et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2083-2088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduced Screening Mammography Among Women With Diabetes
Lipscombe et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2090-2095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bias in the Medical Journals: A Commentary
Kopans
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:176-182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Soluble, Salivary c-erbB-2 for the Detection and Post-operative Follow-up of Breast Cancer in Women: The Results of a Five-year Translational Research Study
Streckfus and Bigler
Adv. Dent. Res. 2005;18:17-24.
FULL TEXT  

Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices
Barratt et al.
BMJ 2005;330:936.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older
Michielutte et al.
Health Educ Res 2005;20:149-162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of Breast Self-Examination on Subsequent Mammography Participation
Jelinski et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:506-511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biennial Versus Annual Mammography and the Risk of Late-Stage Breast Cancer
White et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1832-1839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up?
Taplin et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1518-1527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Risk in Primary Care: Implications for Chemoprevention
Lewis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1897-1903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's perception of mammography screening
Bulliard and Levi
Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:903-904.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review
van Diest et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:675-681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personal choice/social responsibility: Women aged 40-49 years and mammography screening
Willis
Journal of Sociology 2004;40:121-136.
ABSTRACT  

Fear, Anxiety, Worry, and Breast Cancer Screening Behavior: A Critical Review
Consedine et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:501-510.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Infrastructures to Support Proteomic Studies of Tissue and Fluids in Breast Cancer
Mouridsen and Brunner
Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004;3:302-310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of motivations and concerns for genetic testing in hereditary colorectal and breast cancer syndromes
Balmana et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:e44-e44.
FULL TEXT  

Hormone Replacement Therapy and Life Expectancy After Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations: A Decision Analysis
Armstrong et al.
JCO 2004;22:1045-1054.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Recall Rates Following Mammography--Reply
Smith-Bindman et al.
JAMA 2004;291:822-822.
FULL TEXT  

On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer
Freedman et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:43-55.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invasive Cancers Detected after Breast Cancer Screening Yielded a Negative Result: Relationship of Mammographic Density to Tumor Prognostic Factors
Roubidoux et al.
Radiology 2004;230:42-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries
Domenighetti et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:816-821.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2000, Featuring the Uses of Surveillance Data for Cancer Prevention and Control
Weir et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1276-1299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer in the Elderly
Holmes and Muss
CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:227-244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Screening Controversies
Green and Taplin
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:233-241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Sociodemographic Predictors Among White, Black, and Hispanic Women
Selvin and Brett
Am. J. Public Health 2003;93:618-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Framework for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The Case of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
Zapka et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:4-13.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regular Mammography Use Is Associated with Elimination of Age-Related Disparities in Size and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis
Randolph et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:783-790.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Screening Mammography in the East Do More Harm than Good?
Leung et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1841-1846.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations
Kolb et al.
Radiology 2002;225:165-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Survival Among US Whites and Minorities: A SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program Population-Based Study
Clegg et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1985-1993.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Humphrey et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:347-360.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State Trends in Health Risk Factors and Receipt of Clinical Preventive Services Among US Adults During the 1990s
Nelson et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2659-2667.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Analysis of Prophylactic Surgery or Screening for BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: A More Prominent Role For Oophorectomy
van Roosmalen et al.
JCO 2002;20:2092-2100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography
Wells et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:1029-1037.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma
Chamot and Perneger
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2001;55:799-803.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Biopsy for Mammographically Detected Non-palpable Lesions Using a Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Device (Mammotome) and an Upright-type Stereotactic Mammography Unit
Ohsumi et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2001;31:527-531.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary: Learning in Lambeth-- the South-East London Screening Study revisited
Leeder
Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:944-945.
FULL TEXT  

Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs
Stefanek et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1297-1297.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Recall Rates with Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Values of Screening Mammography
Yankaskas et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:543-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies
Ioannidis et al.
JAMA 2001;286:821-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces
Olivotto et al.
CMAJ 2001;165:277-283.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, and Ultrasound for Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer
Warner et al.
JCO 2001;19:3524-3531.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography in Women With a Hereditary Risk of Breast Cancer
Stoutjesdijk et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095-1102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients: A Framework for Individualized Decision Making
Walter and Covinsky
JAMA 2001;285:2750-2756.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Increasing Papanicolaou Test Sensitivity and Compliance: A Modeled Cost and Outcomes Analysis
MONTZ et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:781-788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The menopause and its treatment in perspective
Al-Azzawi
Postgrad. Med. J. 2001;77:292-304.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence based case report: Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer
Lucassen et al.
BMJ 2001;322:1040-1042.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Surveillance in BRCA1/2 Gene Mutation Carriers and Women With High Familial Risk
Brekelmans et al.
JCO 2001;19:924-930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey
Maxwell et al.
CMAJ 2001;164:329-334.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer
Ringash
CMAJ 2001;164:469-476.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mammography in 53,803 Women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network
Poplack et al.
Radiology 2000;217:832-840.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated with Decisions about Clinical BRCA1/2 Testing
Armstrong et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:1251-1254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996
Paquette et al.
CMAJ 2000;163:1133-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Telomerase RNA as a Detection Marker in the Serum of Breast Cancer Patients
Chen et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:3823-3826.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-Year Results of a Randomized Trial in Women Aged 50-59 Years
Miller et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1490-1499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of Mammography Use among Hispanic, American Indian, and Non-Hispanic White Women in New Mexico, 1994-1997
Gilliland et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:432-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prophylactic Mastectomy or Screening in Women Suspected to Have the BRCA1/2 Mutation: A Prospective Pilot Study of Women's Treatment Choices and Medical and Decision-analytic Recommendations
Unic et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:251-262.
ABSTRACT  

Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs
Concato et al.
NEJM 2000;342:1887-1892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey
Schwartz et al.
BMJ 2000;320:1635-1640.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MR Imaging of Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration: Is There a Role for Metaanalysis?
Medina
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:998-999.
FULL TEXT  

Women's Understanding of the Mammography Screening Debate
Woloshin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1434-1440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biologic Characteristics of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancers
Gilliland et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:743-749.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Cervical and Breast Cancer: Is Obesity an Unrecognized Barrier to Preventive Care?
Wee et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:697-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Elderly Women With Breast Cancer
Diab et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:550-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast MR Imaging Screening in 192 Women Proved or Suspected to Be Carriers of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene: Preliminary Results
Kuhl et al.
Radiology 2000;215:267-279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Risk of Breast Cancer
Armstrong et al.
NEJM 2000;342:564-571.
FULL TEXT  

Rates and Correlates of Discomfort Associated with Mammography
Dullum et al.
Radiology 2000;214:547-552.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Need for Perspective in Evidence-Based Medicine
Woolf
JAMA 1999;282:2358-2365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuing Screening Mammography in Women Aged 70 to 79 Years: Impact on Life Expectancy and Cost-effectiveness
Kerlikowske et al.
JAMA 1999;282:2156-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Strategy for Cancer Control Research
Hiatt and Rimer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:957-964.
FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How?
Barton et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Factors Associated with the Use of Breast Cancer Screening by Women Age 60 Years or Over
Michielutte et al.
Health Educ Behav 1999;26:625-647.
ABSTRACT  

Motivating Mammography Adherence in Elderly Latinas: A Test of Three Mathematical Models of Decision Making
Veit
Med Decis Making 1999;19:448-465.
ABSTRACT  

Think HIV: Why Physicians Should Lower Their Threshold for HIV Testing
Freedberg and Samet
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1994-2000.
FULL TEXT  

Detecting Tumor-related Alterations in Plasma or Serum DNA of Patients Diagnosed with Breast Cancer
Chen et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 1999;5:2297-2303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of False-Positive Mammograms on Interval Breast Cancer Screening in a Health Maintenance Organization
Burman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;131:1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Mammography Under Age 50
Antman and Shea
JAMA 1999;281:1470-1472.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Same-Day Screening Mammography Availability: Results of a Controlled Clinical Trial
Dolan et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:393-398.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Control in Susceptible Groups: Opportunities and Challenges
Li
JCO 1999;17:719-719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Breast Cancer Screening Controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40–49
Kopans
Radiology 1999;210:4-9.
FULL TEXT  

The Impact of a Physician Intervention Program on Older Women's Mammography Use
Preston et al.
Eval Health Prof 1998;21:502-513.
ABSTRACT  

Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials • Commentary: The public has a role to play in translating evidence into practice • Commentary: Why are researchers surprised when there is not a smooth transition from research into practice?
Wells et al.
BMJ 1998;317:1224-1230.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Breast Cancer
Hortobagyi
NEJM 1998;339:974-984.
FULL TEXT  

False Positive Rate of Screening Mammography
Olivotto et al.
NEJM 1998;339:560-564.
FULL TEXT  

Intention to Have a Mammogram in the Future Among Women Who Have Underused Mammography in the Past
Allen et al.
Health Educ Behav 1998;25:474-488.
ABSTRACT