You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 20, May 24, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Falling Cholecystectomy Thresholds Since the Introduction of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

José J. Escarce, MD, AM; Wei Chen, MS; J. Sanford Schwartz, MD

JAMA. 1995;273(20):1581-1585.


Abstract

Objectives.
—To determine whether cholecystectomy rates among the elderly increased following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989, and to assess whether changes in rates were accompanied by lower clinical thresholds for performing cholecystectomy.

Design.
—Time-series quasi-experimental design based on quarterly observations from 1986 to 1993. Data were obtained from Medicare hospital discharge files for Pennsylvania.

Patients.
—Medicare patients aged 65 years or older who resided in Pennsylvania, did not have end-stage renal disease, and underwent cholecystectomy in Pennsylvania from 1986 to 1993.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Cholecystectomy rates per 1000 elderly Medicare beneficiaries, stage of gallstone disease (uncomplicated vs complicated) at cholecystectomy, type of admission (elective vs urgent/emergent), patient age and comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative mortality.

Results.
—Cholecystectomy rates increased 22% from 1989 to 1993. The proportions of cholecystectomy patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease and with elective admissions declined from 1986 to 1989 but then increased rapidly after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced. In contrast, the age distribution and comorbidities of cholecystectomy patients did not change during the study period. Postoperative mortality rates were stable from 1986 to 1989 but decreased thereafter.

Conclusions.
—Growth in cholecystectomy rates following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was accompanied by evidence of lower clinical thresholds for performing surgery. The normative, or prescriptive, implications of lower cholecystectomy thresholds require further analyses that consider lower direct medical costs and indirect costs and reduced postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

(JAMA. 1995;273:1581-1585)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Drs Escarce and Schwartz and Ms Chen); Department of Health Care Systems, the Wharton School (Dr Schwartz); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Drs Escarce and Schwartz and Ms Chen), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Presented in part at the 17th annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Washington, DC, April 29, 1994.

Reprint requests to University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Ralston House, 3615 Chestnut St, Room 314, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2676 (Dr Escarce).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Rush to Atrial Septal Defect Closure: Is the Introduction of Percutaneous Closure Driving Utilization?
Karamlou et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;86:1584-1591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Management Observations From Litigation Involving Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
McLean
Arch Surg 2006;141:643-648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accelerated Growth of Bariatric Surgery With the Introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Nguyen et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:1198-1202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rate of elective cholecystectomy and the incidence of severe gallstone disease
Urbach and Stukel
CMAJ 2005;172:1015-1019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Increasing Workload of General Surgery
Liu et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:423-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inpatient Surgery in California: 1990-2000
Liu et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:1106-1112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ten Lessons for Evidence-Based Technology Assessment
Eisenberg
JAMA 1999;282:1865-1869.
FULL TEXT  

Core-Needle and Surgical Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Three Methods of Assessing Cost
Burkhardt and Sunshine
Radiology 1999;212:181-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gallstone Size and Risk of Pancreatitis
Diehl et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1674-1678.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Alternative Techniques of Hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994
Weber and Lee
NEJM 1996;335:483-489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNOLOGY LINKED TO RISE IN CHOLECYSTECTOMIES
JWatch General 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Why Are Cholecystectomy Rates Increasing?
Ransohoff and McSherry
JAMA 1995;273:1621-1622.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.