Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

J. J. Escarce, W. Chen and J. S. Schwartz
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-2676, USA.

OBJECTIVES--To determine whether cholecystectomy rates among the elderly increased following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989, and to assess whether changes in rates were accompanied by lower clinical thresholds for performing cholecystectomy. DESIGN--Time-series quasi-experimental design based on quarterly observations from 1986 to 1993. Data were obtained from Medicare hospital discharge files for Pennsylvania. PATIENTS--Medicare patients aged 65 years or older who resided in Pennsylvania, did not have end-stage renal disease, and underwent cholecystectomy in Pennsylvania from 1986 to 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Cholecystectomy rates per 1000 elderly Medicare beneficiaries, stage of gallstone disease (uncomplicated vs complicated) at cholecystectomy, type of admission (elective vs urgent/emergent), patient age and comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS--Cholecystectomy rates increased 22% from 1989 to 1993. The proportions of cholecystectomy patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease and with elective admissions declined from 1986 to 1989 but then increased rapidly after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced. In contrast, the age distribution and comorbidities of cholecystectomy patients did not change during the study period. Postoperative mortality rates were stable from 1986 to 1989 but decreased thereafter. CONCLUSIONS--Growth in cholecystectomy rates following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was accompanied by evidence of lower clinical thresholds for performing surgery. The normative, or prescriptive, implications of lower cholecystectomy thresholds require further analyses that consider lower direct medical costs and indirect costs and reduced postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Rush to Atrial Septal Defect Closure: Is the Introduction of Percutaneous Closure Driving Utilization?
Karamlou et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;86:1584-1591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Management Observations From Litigation Involving Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
McLean
Arch Surg 2006;141:643-648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accelerated Growth of Bariatric Surgery With the Introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Nguyen et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:1198-1202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rate of elective cholecystectomy and the incidence of severe gallstone disease
Urbach and Stukel
CMAJ 2005;172:1015-1019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Increasing Workload of General Surgery
Liu et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:423-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inpatient Surgery in California: 1990-2000
Liu et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:1106-1112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ten Lessons for Evidence-Based Technology Assessment
Eisenberg
JAMA 1999;282:1865-1869.
FULL TEXT  

Core-Needle and Surgical Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Three Methods of Assessing Cost
Burkhardt and Sunshine
Radiology 1999;212:181-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Alternative Techniques of Hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994
Weber and Lee
NEJM 1996;335:483-489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNOLOGY LINKED TO RISE IN CHOLECYSTECTOMIES
JWatch General 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT