This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Brandon S. Centerwall, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1995;273(22):1755-1758.

Abstract
Objective.
—A study of 222 intraracial domestic homicides in Atlanta, Ga, found that when black and white populations were unstratified, the relative risk of homicide in black populations was 5.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 8.0); when black and white populations were stratified by rates of household crowding, the relative risk of homicide in black populations was no longer significantly elevated (relative risk [RR], 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.0). The current study sought to replicate, or not replicate, these findings in New Orleans, La.

Methods.
—Retrospective study of 349 intraracial domestic homicides perpetrated against residents of Orleans Parish in 1979, 1982, 1985, and 1986.

Main Outcome Measure.
—Relative risk of homicide in the black and white populations of New Orleans when they are stratified by rates of household crowding.

Results.
—When black and white populations of New Orleans were unstratified, the relative risk of intraracial domestic homicide in black populations was 6.3 (95% CI, 4.3 to 9.5). When black and white populations were stratified by rates of household crowding, the relative risk of homicide in black populations was no longer significantly elevated (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.9).

Conclusion.
—The findings of the Atlanta homicide study are replicated in the current study of homicide in New Orleans. In both cities, sixfold differences in black and white rates of intraracial domestic homicide are entirely accounted for by differences in socioeconomic status between the respective black and white populations. There are no significant residual differences requiring cultural explanations.

(JAMA. 1995;273:1755-1758)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Mail Slot SC-36, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Centerwall).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Household crowding index: a correlate of socioeconomic status and inter-pregnancy spacing in an urban setting
Melki et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2004;58:476-480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adolescent Violence: Assessment of Nurses' Attitudes and Educational Needs
Breakey et al.
J Holist Nurs 2001;19:143-162.
ABSTRACT  

Ward Crowding and Incidents of Violence on an Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Unit
Ng et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2001;52:521-525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Crowded Ward
Kumar et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:1499-1499.
FULL TEXT  

Violence Prevention in the Primary Care Setting: A Program for Pediatric Residents
Johnson et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:531-535.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age-Within-School-Class and Adolescent Gun-carrying
Hayes and Hemenway
Pediatrics 1999;103:64e-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Child and adolescent injury and death from urban firearm assaults: association with age, race, and poverty
Powell and Tanz
Inj. Prev. 1999;5:41-47.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduction of Firearm-Related Violence Through Firearm Safety Counseling: The Role of Family Physicians
Price et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:79-83.
ABSTRACT  

VIOLENCE IN AMERICA: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC
JWatch General 1995;1995:8-8.
FULL TEXT