You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 8, February 22, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Estimating Health Expenditure Growth Under Managed Competition

Science, Simulations, and Scenarios

Robert H. Miller, PhD; Harold S. Luft, PhD

JAMA. 1995;273(8):656-662.


Abstract

The estimated impact of health system reform proposals on health expenditures influences the health system reform debate. Health expenditure growth rate (HEGR) estimates are particularly critical because small differences in rates over time create large differences in health expenditures. There currently is no hard scientific basis for estimating the impact of managed care/managed competition legislation and market developments on the HEGR. For the 1994 health system reform debate, the two leading nonpartisan modelers developed qualitative scenarios about future health system developments in which managed care/managed competition would have little or no impact on the HEGR. We conclude that there are alternative plausible scenarios, based on current health system changes interacting with potential legislation, in which managed care/ managed competition will substantially lower the HEGR. We recommend that simulation models should provide a range of estimates that better reflect both market trends and the profound uncertainty about the effects of health system reform.

(JAMA. 1995;273:656-662)



Author Affiliations

From the Institute for Health and Aging (Dr Miller) and the Institute for Health Policy Studies (Dr Luft), University of California, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Interpretations are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Office of Technology Assessment.

Reprint requests to University of California, San Francisco, Institute for Health Policy Studies, 1388 Sutter St, 11th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94109 (Dr Miller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mental Health Staffing in Managed Care Organizations: A Case Study
Scheffler and Ivey
Psychiatr. Serv. 1998;49:1303-1308.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.