You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 9, March 1, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Birth Weight and Perinatal Mortality

A Comparison of the United States and Norway

Allen Wilcox, MD, PhD; Rolv Skjærven, PhD; Pierre Buekens, MD, PhD; John Kiely, PhD

JAMA. 1995;273(9):709-711.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare perinatal mortality in the United States and Norway, using a new analytic approach based on relative birth weight.

Design.
—Comparison of linked birth and perinatal death records for US and Norwegian births from 1986 through 1987, the most recently available 2-year period.

Setting.
—Norway and the United States.

Participants.
—A total of 7445914 US births and 105084 Norwegian births.

Interventions.
—None.

Main Outcome Measure.
—Perinatal weight-specific mortality after adjustment for each country's own mean birth weight.

Results.
—The higher rate of perinatal death in the United States compared with Norway is due to an excess of preterm deliveries in the United States. Low-weight, preterm births comprise 2.9% of US births compared with 2.1% of Norwegian births. If the United States could eliminate this slight excess of preterm delivery, perinatal mortality in the United States would decrease to the level in Norway. Unexpectedly, the survival of newborns at any given birth weight is virtually the same in the United States and Norway when newborns' birth weights are considered relative to their own nation's mean weight.

Conclusions.
—Low rates of perinatal mortality in the Scandinavian countries have usually been attributed to the heavier weights of their newborns. Higher mortality among US infants is in fact due entirely to a small excess of preterm deliveries. The lighter weights of US newborns at term appear not to affect perinatal survival. Furthermore, the apparent survival advantage of low-weight US newborns (used by policymakers as evidence of superior US intensive neonatal care) may be at least partly an artifact. When weight-specific mortality rates are adjusted to relative birth weight, low-weight newborns have the same survival in Norway as in the United States. The prevention of excess mortality among US infants depends on the prevention of preterm births, not on changes in mean birth weight.

(JAMA. 1995;273:709-711)



Author Affiliations

From the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Wilcox); Section for Medical Informatics and Statistics, University of Bergen, Norway (Dr Skjærven); School of Public Health, Free University of Brussels, Belgium (Dr Buekens); and National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md (Dr Kiely).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (Dr Wilcox).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The social gradient in birthweight at term: quantification of the mediating role of maternal smoking and body mass index
Mortensen et al.
Hum Reprod 2009;24:2629-2635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Social inequality in fetal growth: a comparative study of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in the period 1981-2000
Mortensen et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008;62:325-331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association of Birth Weight with Developmental Trends in Blood Pressure from Childhood through Mid-Adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study
Mzayek et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:413-420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regional Variation in Rates of Low Birth Weight
Thompson et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:1114-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Proportional Hazards Model with Time-dependent Covariates and Time-varying Effects for Analysis of Fetal and Infant Death
Platt et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:199-206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Birthweight and perinatal mortality: paradoxes, social class, and sibling dependencies
Melve and Skjaerven
Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:625-632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

On the importance--and the unimportance-- of birthweight
Wilcox
Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1233-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary: Birthweights and Bell Curves
David
Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1241-1243.
FULL TEXT  

Negotiating Activity Restriction: A Grounded Theory of Home Management of Preterm Labor
Durham
Qual Health Res 1999;9:493-503.
ABSTRACT  

Frequency of Neurologic Disorders in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Sheth
J Child Neurol 1998;13:424-428.
ABSTRACT  

Intracellular Signaling and Phasic Myometrial Contractions
Phillippe and Chien
Reproductive Sciences 1998;5:169-177.
ABSTRACT  

Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Military and Civilian Births in California
Barfield et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:1062-1067.
ABSTRACT  

The Continuing Challenge of Preterm Delivery
Adams
JAMA 1995;273:739-740.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.