You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 10, September 13, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Meta-analytic Results Using Literature vs Individual Patient Data

Paternal Cell Immunization for Recurrent Miscarriage

Gary T. Jeng, MS; James R. Scott, MD; Leon F. Burmeister, PhD

JAMA. 1995;274(10):830-836.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare the meta-analytic results from published literature vs those obtained from pooling original patient data.

Data Sources.
—Individual patient data from 15 completed or ongoing trials on paternal white blood cell immunization as treatment for recurrent miscarriage were obtained through the American Society for Reproductive Immunology.

Study Selection.
—Only randomized controlled trials were selected. Within these eight selected trials, 202 patients were from four published studies, 43 were added by the same investigators after publication, and 140 were from four unpublished trials.

Data Extraction.
—Individual patient data were collected using a standardized form and double data entry.

Data Synthesis.
—Using the fixed treatment effect model, we found that the effect of immunization, denoted as the relative live-birth ratio (RR), was greater by pooling summary data from published articles (RR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.60) than by pooling all individual patient data from the same investigators (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.37) or when individual patient data were pooled from four unpublished trials (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.28). A similar diminishing treatment effect for the same comparisons was observed using the random treatment effect model (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.87 using published summary data; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.42 using individual patient data; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.28 using unpublished trials).

Conclusions.
—Meta-analytic results may differ depending on the use of various data sources: whether the source was from summary statistics in the literature, from individual patient data provided by trialists, or from unpublished trials.

(JAMA. 1995;274:830-836)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Mr Jeng and Dr Burmeister), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Scott).


Footnotes

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical impact of thrombectomy in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient-data pooled analysis of 11 trials
Burzotta et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;0:ehp348v1-ehp348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice
Simmonds et al.
Clin Trials 2005;2:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Natural Killer Cells in Pregnancy and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Endocrine and Immunologic Perspectives
Dosiou and Giudice
Endocr. Rev. 2005;26:44-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risedronate Prevents New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women at High Risk
Watts et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;88:542-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials
Sim et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:440-450.
ABSTRACT  

The Diagnostic Utility of the Lognormal Behavior of PET Standardized Uptake Values in Tumors
Thie et al.
JNM 2000;41:1664-1672.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pleural Fluid pH as a Predictor of Survival for Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions*
Heffner et al.
Chest 2000;117:79-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pleural Fluid pH as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Failure* : Analysis of Primary Data
Heffner et al.
Chest 2000;117:87-95.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Relationships Between Age, Sex, and the Incidence of Dementia and Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis
Gao et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:809-815.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-Analysis of Linkage Data under Worst-Case Conditions: A Demonstration Using the Human OB Region
Allison and Heo
Genetics 1998;148:859-866.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immunotherapy for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: "Standard of Care of Buyer Beware"
Hill
Reproductive Sciences 1997;4:267-273.
 

Effects of Acadesine on Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Death Following Surgery: A Meta-analysis of the 5 International Randomized Trials
Mangano
JAMA 1997;277:325-332.
ABSTRACT  

From Science to Practice: Meta-analyses Using Individual Patient Data Are Needed
Oxman et al.
JAMA 1995;274:845-846.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.