You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 11, September 20, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients

K. C. Kent, K. M. Kuntz, M. R. Patel, D. Kim, R. A. Klufas, A. D. Whittemore, J. F. Polak, J. J. Skillman and R. R. Edelman
Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the cost-effectiveness of four diagnostic strategies for the preoperative evaluation of symptomatic patients who are potential candidates for carotid endarterectomy (ie, 70% to 99% stenosis): (1) duplex sonography (DS), (2) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), (3) contrast angiography (CA), and (4) the combination of DS and MRA supplemented by CA for disparate results. METHODS--Cost-effectiveness analysis based largely on published clinical trial data. Sensitivities and specificities of noninvasive tests were estimated from 81 patients undergoing prospective evaluation with DS, MRA, and CA. OUTCOME MEASURE--Incremental cost per quality-adjusted year of life gained. RESULTS--For a hypothetical cohort of symptomatic patients undergoing evaluation for carotid endarterectomy, the combination of tests resulted in the greatest quality-adjusted life expectancy of the four options considered. After incorporating the costs of testing, surgery, and stroke, we found that neither the MRA nor the CA strategy was cost-effective. The combination of tests was more effective but more costly than DS, resulting in an additional cost of $22,400 per quality-adjusted year of life gained. For centers that do not have adequate MRA, CA resulted in an additional cost of $99,200 per quality-adjusted year of life saved compared with DS. CONCLUSIONS--Our results suggest that for the preoperative detection of a 70% to 99% carotid stenosis, the combination of DS and MRA, supplemented by CA for disparate results, is associated with the lowest long-term morbidity and mortality and has a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. The combination of tests, or DS alone when MRA is not available, could potentially replace the current practice of using CA alone in the preoperative evaluation of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Projected costs of ischemic stroke in the United States
Brown et al.
Neurology 2006;67:1390-1395.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Management of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease
Faries et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2006;40:165-175.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis by Doppler Sonography: State of the Art
Gaitini and Soudack
J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1127-1136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies
Gazelle et al.
Radiology 2005;235:361-370.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Imaging of Carotid Arteries in Symptomatic Patients: Cost-effectiveness of Diagnostic Strategies
Buskens et al.
Radiology 2004;233:101-112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Classic 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in the Depiction of Severe Carotid Stenosis
DeMarco et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:787-793.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive Carotid Imaging
Wierks and Labropoulos
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2004;16:89-99.
ABSTRACT  

Cost of Identifying Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy
Benade and Warlow
Stroke 2002;33:435-439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs and Benefits of Carotid Endarterectomy and Associated Preoperative Arterial Imaging: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Literature
Benade and Warlow
Stroke 2002;33:629-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colour flow Doppler ultrasound of the carotid bifurcation: can it replace routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy?
Dinkel et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2001;74:590-594.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography
Johnston and Goldstein
Neurology 2001;56:1009-1015.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke A Comprehensive Review Editorial Comment : Health-Related Quality Of Life After Stroke: A Comprehensive Review
Tengs et al.
Stroke 2001;32:964-972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Carotid Endarterectomy Performed with Preoperative Duplex Ultrasound Assessment Alone
Melissano et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2001;35:95-101.
ABSTRACT  

Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease
Serfaty et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;175:455-463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Power Doppler Imaging: Initial Evaluation as a Screening Examination for Carotid Artery Stenosis
Bluth et al.
Radiology 2000;215:791-800.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ability to Use Duplex US to Quantify Internal Carotid Arterial Stenoses: Fact or Fiction?1
Grant et al.
Radiology 2000;214:247-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Yucel et al.
Circulation 1999;100:2284-2301.
FULL TEXT  

Significant Reductions in Length of Stay After Carotid Endarterectomy Can Be Safely Accomplished Without Modifying Either Anesthetic Technique or Postoperative ICU Monitoring
Angevine et al.
Stroke 1999;30:2341-2346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Research of Stroke Evaluation and Treatment
Holloway et al.
Stroke 1999;30:1340-1349.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound : A Hemodynamic Method to Normalize for Interindividual and Interequipment Variability
Ranke et al.
Stroke 1999;30:402-406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Should Carotid Endarterectomy be Performed on the Basis of Carotid Noninvasive Examination Alone?
Purcell and Brewster
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1998;9:1-15.
ABSTRACT  

Carotid Endarterectomy Trends in the Patterns and Outcomes of Care at Academic Medical Centers, 1990 Through 1995
Holloway et al.
Arch Neurol 1998;55:25-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cerebral Angiography Practices at US Teaching Hospitals : Implications for Carotid Endarterectomy
Chaturvedi et al.
Stroke 1997;28:1895-1897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Efficacy of Noninvasive Screening for Patients With Asymptomatic Neck Bruits
Obuchowski et al.
Stroke 1997;28:1330-1339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice Guidelines for the Use of Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attacks and Acute Stroke : A Report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association
Culebras et al.
Stroke 1997;28:1480-1497.
FULL TEXT  

Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for the Identification of Carotid Stenosis Should Be Laboratory Specific
Kuntz et al.
Stroke 1997;28:597-602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Carotid Endarterectomy Without Angiography: Are We Ready?
Zwolak
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:1-9.
 

An Analysis of Perioperative Surgical Mortality and Morbidity in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study
Young et al.
Stroke 1996;27:2216-2224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease
Derdeyn and Powers
Stroke 1996;27:1944-1950.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Approach for the Use of Doppler Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Hemodynamically Significant Stenosis (Despite Heterogeneity of Doppler Performance): A Multicenter Experience
Howard et al.
Stroke 1996;27:1951-1957.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery: The Dilemma of Total versus Near Total Occlusion
El-Saden et al.
Radiology 2001;221:301-308.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology
Hunink and Krestin
Radiology 2002;222:604-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.