Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes

K. Grumbach, G. M. Anderson, H. S. Luft, L. L. Roos and R. Brook
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

OBJECTIVE--To determine how regionalization of facilities for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) affects geographic access to CABS and surgical outcomes. DESIGN--Computerized hospital discharge records were used to measure hospital CABS volume and in-hospital post-CABS mortality rates. Relationships between surgical volume and age- and sex-adjusted mortality rates were compared using chi 2 tests. Small-area analysis of the association between CABS rates and distances to nearest CABS hospital was performed using multivariate linear regression methods. SETTING--All nonfederal hospitals in New York, California, Ontario, Manitoba, and British Columbia. PATIENTS--All adult residents of the five jurisdictions who underwent CABS in a hospital in their jurisdiction from 1987 through 1989. RESULTS--In New York and Canada, approximately 60% of all CABS operations took place in hospitals performing 500 or more CABS operations per year, compared with only 26% in California. The highest mortality rates were found among California hospitals performing fewer than 100 CABS operations per year (adjusted 14-day in-hospital mortality was 4.7% compared with 2.4% in high-volume California hospitals, P < .001). The percentage of the population residing within 25 miles of a CABS hospital was 91% in California, 82% in New York, and less than 60% in Canada. Eliminating very low-volume (< 100 cases per year) CABS hospitals in California would increase travel distances to a CABS hospital only slightly for a small number of residents. The Canadian degree of regionalization was not associated with lower CABS rates within provinces for populations living at more remote distances from the nearest CABS hospital. CONCLUSION--Regionalization of CABS facilities in New York and Canada largely avoids the problem of low-volume outlier hospitals with high postoperative mortality rates found in California. New York has avoided the redundancy of facilities that exists in California while still providing residents a geographically convenient selection of CABS hospitals. Stricter regionalization in Canada may leave residents with a more narrow choice of facilities, but does not disproportionately affect access to surgery for populations living at remote distances from CABS facilities.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume
Ricciardi et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:338-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification and Comorbidity
Ferraris et al.
Card Surg Adult 2008;3:199-246.
FULL TEXT  

Estimating the potential impact of regionalizing health care delivery based on volume standards versus risk-adjusted mortality rate
Glance et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:195-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Wharton et al.
Circulation 2005;112:3509-3534.
FULL TEXT  

Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Regionalized?
Nallamothu et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005;80:1572-1581.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Patient Risk on the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Nallamothu et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:333-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regionalization of Coronary Angioplasty and Travel Distance
Lee et al.
JAMA 2005;293:295-296.
FULL TEXT  

Regionalization of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Implications for Patient Travel Distance
Kansagra et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1717-1723.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regionalization of Treatment for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Cost-Utility Analysis
Bardach et al.
Circulation 2004;109:2207-2212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of regionalisation of cardiac surgery in Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Nobilio et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2004;58:97-102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG Surgery
Peterson et al.
JAMA 2004;291:195-201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regionalization of High-Risk Surgery and Implications for Patient Travel Times
Birkmeyer et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2703-2708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Hospitals and Surgeons With Higher Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volumes Still Have Lower Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates?
Hannan et al.
Circulation 2003;108:795-801.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality in Cancer Surgery: A National Study
Finlayson et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:721-725.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume Expansion With Albumin Decreases Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Sedrakyan et al.
Chest 2003;123:1853-1857.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog
Shahian and Normand
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:1048-1058.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification and Comorbidity
Ferraris and Ferraris
Card Surg Adult 2003;2:187-224.
FULL TEXT  

Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature
Halm et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:511-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Primary Care Home for Americans: Putting the House in Order
Grumbach and Bodenheimer
JAMA 2002;288:889-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Achieving And Sustaining Improved Quality: Lessons From New York State And Cardiac Surgery
Chassin
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:40-51.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association Between Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcomes and Number of Cases Treated at California Hospitals * Editorial Comment
Bardach et al.
Stroke 2002;33:1851-1856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better?
Nallamothu et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1923-1930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume versus Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proper Perspective is Paramount
Clark and Heckman
JBJS 2001;83:1619-1621.
FULL TEXT  

Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population
Katz et al.
JBJS 2001;83:1622-1629.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung Cancer
Bach et al.
NEJM 2001;345:181-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Problems for clinical judgement: 4. Surviving in the report card era
Tu et al.
CMAJ 2001;164:1709-1712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Of Care For Coronary Heart Disease In Two Countries
Ayanian and Quinn
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:55-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selection of a cardiac surgery provider in the managed care era
Shahian et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000;120:978-989.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evolution of the Volume-Outcome Relation for Hospitals Performing Coronary Angioplasty
Ho
Circulation 2000;101:1806-1811.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospitals must become "focused factories"
Leung
BMJ 2000;320:942a-942.
FULL TEXT  

Selective Referral to High-Volume Hospitals: Estimating Potentially Avoidable Deaths
Dudley et al.
JAMA 2000;283:1159-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Risk Surgery--Follow the Crowd
Birkmeyer
JAMA 2000;283:1191-1193.
FULL TEXT  

Commentary
Hannan
Med Care Res Rev 1999;56:363-372.
 

The Movement for Improved Quality in Health Care
Bodenheimer
NEJM 1999;340:488-492.
FULL TEXT  

The Autopsy: Still Important in Cardiac Surgery
Zehr et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997;64:380-383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Artery Bypass Mortality Rates in Ontario: A Canadian Approach to Quality Assurance in Cardiac Surgery
Tu and Naylor
Circulation 1996;94:2429-2433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regionalizing CABG May Save Lives
Journal Watch Cardiology 1996;1996:1-1.
FULL TEXT