You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 18, November 8, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes of Patients With Hypertension and Non—insulin-dependentn Diabetes Mellitus Treated by Different Systems and Specialties

Results From the Medical Outcomes Study

Sheldon Greenfield, MD; William Rogers, PhD; Maureen Mangotich, MD, MPH; Maureen F. Carney, MS; Alvin R. Tarlov, MD

JAMA. 1995;274(18):1436-1444.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare the outcomes of patients with hypertension and non— insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who were cared for in three different systems of care and by generalist and subspecialist physicians.

Design.
—An observational study with follow-up at three periods: (1) a 2-year study of 532 patients with hypertension and 170 patients with NIDDM who had entrance and exit histories, physical examinations, and laboratory tests; (2) a 4-year follow-up of 1044 patients with hypertension and 317 patients with NIDDM based on patient-reported functional status; and (3) 7-year mortality for 1296 patients with hypertension and 424 patients with NIDDM.

Setting and Participants.
—Patients sampled from health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo or single-specialty group practices in Boston, Mass, Los Angeles, Calif, and Chicago, Ill. Patients were designated as belonging to one of three systems of care: fee for service; prepaid patients in solo or small single-specialty groups or in large multispecialty group practices, referred to as independent practice associations; and staff-model health maintenance organizations. The principal providers were family practitioners, general internists, cardiologists, or endocrinologists.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Physiological, functional, and mortality. For hypertension, we measured blood pressure and stroke incidence. For NIDDM, we measured blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin level, visual function, vibration sense, ulcers and infections in the feet, and albumin excretion rate. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Mortality was assessed for the 7 years following the entrance examination.

Results.
—We found no evidence that any one system of care or physician specialty achieved consistently better 2-year or 4-year outcomes than others for patients with NIDDM or hypertension. Endocrinologists appeared to achieve better foot-ulcer and infection outcomes for patients with NIDDM, particularly when compared with family practitioners. However, no other specialist differences were found in any individual measures for either condition. Moreover, no adjusted mortality differences among systems or among physician specialties were observed in the 7-year follow-up period.

Conclusion.
—No meaningful differences were found in the mean health outcomes for patients with hypertension or NIDDM, whether they were treated by different care systems or by different physician specialists. Although prepaid medicine relies more heavily on generalist physicians than does fee for service, there is no evidence from these analyses that the quality of care of moderately ill patients with these two common diseases was adversely affected. These findings must be viewed in light of the historically higher costs of fee-for-service medicine and of subspecialty physician practice.

(JAMA. 1995;274:1436-1444)



Author Affiliations

From The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Drs Greenfield, Rogers, and Tarlov); Department of Medicine, Tufts University Medical School, Boston (Drs Greenfield and Tarlov); Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (Drs Greenfield and Tarlov); Value Health Sciences, Santa Monica, Calif (Dr Mangotich); and RAND, Santa Monica (Ms Carney).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Box 345, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Greenfield).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Science of Connectedness
Stange
Ann Fam Med 2009;7:387-395.
FULL TEXT  

The Paradox of Primary Care
Stange and Ferrer
Ann Fam Med 2009;7:293-299.
FULL TEXT  

The effect of specialist care within the first year on subsequent outcomes in 24 232 adults with new-onset diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study
McAlister et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:6-11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Outcomes Resulting From Generalist vs Specialist Care for a Single Discrete Medical Condition: A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique
Smetana et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:10-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Which Type of Medical Group Provides Higher-Quality Care?
Casalino
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:860-861.
FULL TEXT  

Advancing Health Disparities Research Within the Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework
Kilbourne et al.
AJPH 2006;96:2113-2121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Impact of Visual Acuity on Quality of Life in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Using the Short Form-36
Clarke et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1506-1511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A systematic review of studies comparing myocardial infarction mortality for generalists and specialists: lessons for research and health policy.
Hartz and James
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:291-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Care Management
Schmittdiel et al.
Ann Fam Med 2006;4:117-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Psychological Distress a Risk Factor for the Incidence of Diabetes Among American Indians? The Strong Heart Study
Daniels et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 2006;25:60S-72S.
ABSTRACT  

High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 4: Can Costs Be Controlled While Preserving Quality?
Bodenheimer and Fernandez
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:26-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care
O'Connor et al.
Ann Fam Med 2005;3:300-306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Report on Financing the New Model of Family Medicine
Spann and for the members of Task Force 6 and The Executive
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:S1-S21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Many Problems Do Family Physicians Manage at Each Encounter? A WReN Study
Beasley et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:405-410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic Position and Health among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature
Brown et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:63-77.
FULL TEXT  

The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community
Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Commi
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:S3-S32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics
De Berardis et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:398-406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Decisions Regarding HbA1c Results in Primary Care: A report from CaReNet and HPRN
Parnes et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:13-16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Closing the Gap: Effect of Diabetes Case Management on Glycemic Control Among Low-Income Ethnic Minority Populations: The California Medi-Cal Type 2 Diabetes Study
The California Medi-Cal Type 2 Diabetes Study Grou
Diabetes Care 2004;27:95-103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Diabetes Processes of Care in Managed Care
Ilag et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2722-2727.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits of and Barriers to Large Medical Group Practice in the United States
Casalino et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1958-1964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comorbidity: Implications for the Importance of Primary Care in 'Case' Management
Starfield et al.
Ann Fam Med 2003;1:8-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Burden of Diabetes (Care)
Hirsch
Diabetes Care 2003;26:1613-1614.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Medicine in Crisis: Toward Reconstruction and Renewal
Moore and Showstack
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:244-247.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic Illness Management: What Is the Role of Primary Care?
Rothman and Wagner
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:256-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Is an Academic General Internist?: Career Options and Training Pathways
Levinson and Linzer
JAMA 2002;288:2045-2048.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring and Improving Preventive Care for Patients With Diabetes in Primary Health Centers
Harwell et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2002;17:179-184.
ABSTRACT  

Influence of Health Care Providers on the Development of Diabetes Complications: Long-term follow-up from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study
Zgibor et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:1584-1590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subspecialist Care Improves Diabetes Outcomes
Cobin
Diabetes Care 2002;25:1654-1656.
FULL TEXT  

A Primary Care Home for Americans: Putting the House in Order
Grumbach and Bodenheimer
JAMA 2002;288:889-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practice
Stange
Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:267-268.
FULL TEXT  

Physician Specialty Is Associated With Differences in the Evaluation and Management of Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
Werning et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:123-130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health-care use by rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with non-arthritic subjects
Girard et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:167-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Profiling Care Provided by Different Groups of Physicians: Effects of Patient Case-Mix (Bias) and Physician-Level Clustering on Quality Assessment Results
Greenfield et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:111-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hidden Barriers to Improvement in the Quality of Care
McNeil
NEJM 2001;345:1612-1620.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Outcomes of Adults With Asthma Treated by Specialists and Generalists in Managed Care
Wu et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2554-2560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Inertia
Phillips et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:825-834.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Ambulatory Patients
Knight et al.
Hypertension 2001;38:809-814.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Quality of Care by Specialist and Generalist Physicians as Usual Source of Asthma Care for Children
Diette et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:432-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Advanced Practice Nurses in a Shared Care Diabetes Practice Model
Brown et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2001;27:492-502.
 

Patient Attitudes Toward Physician Financial Incentives
Pereira and Pearson
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1313-1317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Process and Outcomes for Managed Care Patients Receiving New Antidepressant Prescriptions From Psychiatrists and Primary Care Physicians
Simon et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:395-401.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personal Barriers to Diabetes Care: Is It Me, Them, or Us?: Preface
Simmons
Diabetes Spectr. 2001;14:10-12.
FULL TEXT  

The Primary Care Provider and the Care of Skin Disease: The Patient's Perspective
Federman et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:25-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Skilled Nursing Facility Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes Under Medicare Managed Care and Medicare Fee-for-Service Reimbursement
Angelelli et al.
Gerontologist 2000;40:646-653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variations in the Care of Elderly Persons With Diabetes Among Endocrinologists, General Internists, and Geriatricians
Chin et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2000;55:601M-606.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Outpatient Diabetes Management Through a Collaboration of Six Competing, Capitated Medicare Managed Care Plans
Marshall et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2000;15:65-71.
ABSTRACT  

Resource Use and Survival of Patients Hospitalized with Congestive Heart Failure: Differences in Care by Specialty of the Attending Physician
Auerbach et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:191-200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

General neurologist and subspecialist care for multiple sclerosis : Patients' perceptions
Vickrey et al.
Neurology 1999;53:1190-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Practice Management Organizations: Their Prospects and Performance
Conrad et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1999;56:307-339.
ABSTRACT  

Optimizing Care for Persons with HIV Infection
Hecht et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;131:136-143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Investor-Owned vs Not-for-Profit HMOs
Himmelstein et al.
JAMA 1999;282:159-163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Physicians Should Be Coordinators, Not Gatekeepers
Bodenheimer et al.
JAMA 1999;281:2045-2049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival and Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Medicare Patients in Two Group/Staff Health Maintenance Organizations and the Fee-for-Service Setting
Merrill et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1999;56:177-196.
ABSTRACT  

Diabetes Case Management
Davidson
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:862-862.
FULL TEXT  

Patient perception of quality of care provided by specialists and generalists
Schwartz et al.
Mult Scler 1998;4:426-432.
ABSTRACT  

Consultation Between Cardiologists and Generalists in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Quality of Care
Willison et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1778-1783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managed Care, Medical Technology, and Health Care Cost Growth: A Review of the Evidence
Chernew et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:259-288.
ABSTRACT  

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Donohoe
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Developing a Tool for Analyzing Medical Care Utilization of Adult Asthma Patients in Indemnity and Managed Care Plans: Can an Episodes of Care Framework Be Used?
Rosen and Mayer-Oakes
American Journal of Medical Quality 1998;13:203-212.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Provider Continuity in Preventing Hospitalizations
Gill and Mainous III
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:352-357.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Managed Care on Quality: A Review of Recent Evidence
Hellinger
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:833-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Developing Episodes of Care for Adult Asthma Patients: A Cautionary Tale*{dagger}
Rosen et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1998;13:25-35.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Patients of Cardiologists and Generalist Physicians
Ayanian et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2570-2576.
ABSTRACT  

The Effects of Insurance Coverage on the Quality of Prenatal Care
Klinkman et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:557-566.
ABSTRACT  

What Is Outcomes Research and What Can It Tell Us?
Slater
Eval Health Prof 1997;20:243-264.
ABSTRACT  

Primary Care Physicians' Satisfaction With Quality of Care in California Capitated Medical Groups
Kerr et al.
JAMA 1997;278:308-312.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of Physician and Hospital Use among the Nonelderly Covered by HMOs and Indemnity Insurance
Fama and Bernstein
Med Care Res Rev 1997;54:239-254.
ABSTRACT  

Competing Priorities and Comorbidities: So Much to Do and So Little Time
Schwenk
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:238-239.
ABSTRACT  

Do We Understand the Effects of 'Managed Care' in Ophthalmology? A Review and Analysis
Asch et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:531-536.
ABSTRACT  

Preserving Community in Health Care
Emanuel and Emanuel
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1997;22:147-184.
ABSTRACT  

Payment by Capitation and the Quality of Care- Part Five of Six
Berwick
NEJM 1996;335:1227-1231.
FULL TEXT  

Differences in 4-Year Health Outcomes for Elderly and Poor, Chronically III Patients Treated in HMO and Fee-for-Service Systems: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Ware et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1039-1047.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Persons With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Fee-for-Service and Prepaid Group Practice Settings
Yelin et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1048-1053.
ABSTRACT  

Continuous Quality Improvement Can Improve Glycemic Control for HMO Patients With Diabetes
O'Connor et al.
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:502-506.
ABSTRACT  

Lack of Correlation Between Internists' Ability in Dermatology and Their Patterns of Treating Patients With Skin Disease
Kirsner and Federman
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:1043-1046.
ABSTRACT  

The Emerging Role of "Hospitalists" in the American Health Care System
Wachter and Goldman
NEJM 1996;335:514-517.
FULL TEXT  

Family Medicine
Bowman and Schwenk
JAMA 1996;275:1809-1810.
ABSTRACT  

General Internal Medicine
Petersen and Daley
JAMA 1996;275:1811-1812.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Managed Care on Patients' Trust in Medical Care and Their Physicians
Mechanic and Schlesinger
JAMA 1996;275:1693-1697.
ABSTRACT  

The Medical Outcomes Study
Testa
JAMA 1996;275:1083-1083.
ABSTRACT  

The Medical Outcomes Study
Smith
JAMA 1996;275:1084-1084.
ABSTRACT  

The Medical Outcomes Study
Matz
JAMA 1996;275:1083-1084.
ABSTRACT  

The Medical Outcomes Study
Kastner
JAMA 1996;275:1084-1084.
ABSTRACT  

HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES OUTCOMES -- BY SPECIALTY AND PRACTICE SETTING
JWatch General 1995;1995:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

Physician Specialty, Systems of Health Care, and Patient Outcomes
Fihn
JAMA 1995;274:1473-1474.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.