You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 19, November 15, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Concepts in Emergency and Critical Care
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Potentially Ineffective Care

A New Outcome to Assess the Limits of Critical Care

Laura Esserman, MD, MBA; Jeffrey Belkora, MS; Leslie Lenert, MD, MS

JAMA. 1995;274(19):1544-1551.


Abstract

Objective.
—To examine the limits of the effectiveness of critical care through the study of patients for whom it was ineffective.

Design.
—We studied the relationship between resource use and long-term outcome (2-year follow-up) in 402 consecutively admitted critical care patients to develop a benchmark for ineffective applications of critical care. We defined an outcome called potentially ineffective care (PIC), developed and evaluated a model with an independent data set to predict PIC from a patient's response to treatment, and estimated the economic effects of limiting care after a prediction of PIC.

Setting.
—The combined medical and surgical intensive care unit at a 600-bed university teaching hospital.

Patients.
—Two groups of 402 consecutively admitted critical care patients, one from 1989, the other from 1991.

Main Outcome Measures and Results.
—Based on observations from a two-dimensional plot of resource use vs benefit for 402 critical care patients, PIC was defined as resource use in the upper 25th percentile and survival for less than 100 days after discharge. Thirteen percent of the patients fell into the PIC category and used 32% of the resources. A product of the APACHE risk estimates on days 1 and 5 of at least 0.35 predicted 37% of PIC outcomes with a specificity of 98%. In a second data set, PIC outcome prediction had a sensitivity of 43% and a specificity of 94%, and a positive predictive value of 80%. For the hospital studied, reduction of intensity of treatment after a prediction of a PIC outcome would result in a reduction of hospital charges in the range of $1.8 million to $5 million per year.

Conclusion.
—Patients in the PIC category consumed a large portion of the resources devoted to critical care at an academic teaching hospital. We suggest a change in focus from assessment of the quality of critical care and risk-adjusted mortality to an assessment of ineffective care based on outcome and resource use and a patient's response to treatment over time.

(JAMA. 1995;274:1544-1551)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Esserman) and Medicine (Dr Lenert), Stanford University School of Medicine; the Department of Engineering Economic Systems, Stanford University (Mr Belkora); and the Stanford University Graduate School of Business (Dr Esserman), Stanford, Calif.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to UCSF-Mount Zion Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Box 1610.74, San Francisco, CA 94143-1610.74 (Dr Esserman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors influencing length of stay in the intensive care unit.
Gruenberg et al.
Am J Crit Care 2006;15:502-509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Patient Outcomes, Futility, and Resource Utilization in the Intensive Care Unit: The Role of Severity Scoring Systems and General Outcome Prediction Models
Mendez-Tellez and Dorman
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:161-163.
 

Identifying Potentially Ineffective Care in the Sickest Critically Ill Patients on the Third ICU Day
Afessa et al.
Chest 2004;126:1905-1909.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Circumstances Surrounding End of Life in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Garros et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:e371-371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life-Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Schneiderman et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1166-1172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of and Resource Consumption by High-Cost Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Welton et al.
Am J Crit Care 2002;11:467-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Health Care Costs Be Reduced by Limiting Intensive Care at the End of Life?
LUCE and RUBENFELD
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:750-754.
FULL TEXT  

Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study
Goh and Mok
Arch. Dis. Child. 2001;84:265-268.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients Readmitted to ICUs* : A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes
Rosenberg and Watts
Chest 2000;118:492-502.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Potentially Ineffective Care in Intensive Care
Riley et al.
JAMA 1998;279:651-654.
FULL TEXT  

Fair Allocation of Intensive Care Unit Resources
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:1282-1301.
FULL TEXT  

Method of Medicare Reimbursement and the Rate of Potentially Ineffective Care of Critically III Patients
Cher and Lenert
JAMA 1997;278:1001-1007.
ABSTRACT  

Critical Care Medicine
Hollenberg and Parrillo
JAMA 1996;275:1799-1800.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.