You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 2, July 12, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Revascularization for Femoropopliteal Disease

A Decision and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Maria G. M. Hunink, MD, PhD; John B. Wong, MD; Magruder C. Donaldson, MD; Michael F. Meyerovitz, MD; Jelle de Vries; Donald P. Harrington, MD

JAMA. 1995;274(2):165-171.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the relative benefits and cost-effectiveness of revascularization for femoropopliteal disease using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or bypass surgery.

Design.
—Decision analysis using a multistate transition simulation model (Markov process) and cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the health care system.

Setting.
—Based on mortality, morbidity, patency, and cost data from a literature review.

Patients.
—Hypothetical cohort of patients with chronic femoropopliteal disease who desire revascularization. Subgroup analysis for patients defined by age, sex, indication, lesion type, and graft type.

Interventions.
—Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, bypass surgery, and a strategies combining the two treatments.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Five-year patency results, quality-adjusted life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Results.
—For 65-year-old men with disabling claudication and a femoropopliteal stenosis or occlusion and for 65-year-old men with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal stenosis, initial angioplasty increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2 to 13 months and resulted in decreased lifetime expenditures compared with bypass surgery. For patients with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal occlusion, initial bypass surgery increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1 to 4 months and resulted in decreased lifetime expenditures compared with angioplasty. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that angioplasty would always be the preferred initial treatment if the angioplasty 5-year patency rate exceeds 30%.

Conclusion.
—Angioplasty is the preferred initial treatment in patients with disabling claudication and a femoropopliteal stenosis or occlusion and in those with chronic critical ischemia and a stenosis. Bypass surgery is the preferred initial treatment in patients with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal occlusion.

(JAMA. 1995;274:165-171)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, and Office for Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands (Dr Hunink and Mr de Vries); the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Hunink); the Division of Clinical Decision Making, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Dr Wong); the Division of Vascular Surgery (Dr Donaldson) and the Department of Radiology (Dr Meyerovitz), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and the Department of Radiology, State University of New York at Stony Brook (Dr Harrington).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Health Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Faculty of Medicine, University of Groningen, Ant Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands (Dr Hunink).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Routine stent implantation vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Kasapis et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:44-55.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Critical Limb Ischemia: Microvascular Therapies Coming of Age
Tongers et al.
Circulation 2008;118:9-16.
FULL TEXT  

Endovascular Therapies for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Evidence-Based Review
White and Gray
Circulation 2007;116:2203-2215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease
Zeller
Vasc Med 2007;12:223-234.
ABSTRACT  

Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease
Klonaris et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2006;18:329-341.
ABSTRACT  

Long-Term Results After Directional Atherectomy of Femoro-Popliteal Lesions
Zeller et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1573-1578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation
Hirsch et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1239-1312.
FULL TEXT  

Lower-Extremity Arterial Disease
Cunningham and Conte
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2005;17:351-361.
ABSTRACT  

The challenges of treating peripheral arterial disease
Kugler and Rudofsky
Vasc Med 2003;8:109-114.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term Outcome of Patients with Claudication after Balloon Angioplasty of the Femoropopliteal Arteries
Jamsen et al.
Radiology 2002;225:345-352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Infrainguinal Bypass Conduit: Autogenous or Synthetic - A National Perspective
Merrell and Gusberg
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2002;36:247-254.
ABSTRACT  

Balloon Dilation and Stent Implantation for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: Meta-Analysis
Muradin et al.
Radiology 2001;221:137-145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost and Patency Rate Targets for the Development of Endovascular Devices to Treat Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Muradin and Myriam Hunink
Radiology 2001;218:464-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peripheral Arterial Obstruction: Prospective Study of Treatment with a Transluminally Placed Self-expanding Stent-Graft
Lammer et al.
Radiology 2000;217:95-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Time-tradeoff Method for Cost--Efifectiveness Models Applied to Radiology
Swan et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:79-88.
ABSTRACT  

Cervical Spine Screening with CT in Trauma Patients: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Blackmore et al.
Radiology 1999;212:117-125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery: Which Ones Need Treatment and How
Powell and Walsh
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1999;10:119-132.
ABSTRACT  

Uncertainty in Decision Models Analyzing Cost-Effectiveness: The Joint Distribution of Incremental Costs and Effectiveness Evaluated with a Nonparametric Bootstrap Method
Hunink et al.
Med Decis Making 1998;18:337-346.
ABSTRACT  

A 52-Year-Old Woman With Diabetes and Claudication
McDaniel
JAMA 1998;279:615-621.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Arterial Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities: A Critical Review
Weitz et al.
Circulation 1996;94:3026-3049.
FULL TEXT  

Intermittent Claudication: Cost-effectiveness of Revascularization versus Exercise Therapy
de Vries et al.
Radiology 2002;222:25-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.